Pretty good news, but I think it glosses over the fact that this was a gamble. Speculation using company reserves, that, at one point, was in real danger of liquidation (even by his own admission). Don't be fooled into thinking this is ever a good strategy for any business to turn a profit from anything else other than what the business was meant to do.
And this is what the mindset of other CEO, this is gamble and they don't want to do is as what Michael Saylor does. Even Elon Musk have to liquidate something, although he has a excuse - but Twitter and needed some funds.
So for governments like El Salvador, it's really a risk and that's what the critics of Bukele to proved specially we are in the bear market. So in order for Saylor and his MicroStrategy to be profitable, he just have to wait for the next bull run and see how high it will go.
They don't need to, and they aren't (those who consistently do fail a lot, why do you think there are big scadals like FTX? because CEOs gamble).
The point here is, good for MS and Saylor but we don't need that good news for Bitcoin -- if anything it cements Bitcoin's misrepresentation as purely a speculative tool. I don't think Bukele does it the right way, but I also don't think it can be compared to Saylor...
