The job of US Presidency is a big and highly important job. Yet voting doesn't include anything that is solid, since a president doesn't have to fulfill his promises... and sometimes isn't allowed to by Congress.
Which of you would simply hand over $10,000 to a stranger based on some promises he made? You at least would want to get some kind of signed contract or agreement, right?
I say that a candidates platform should be a contract, and that it should have details including dates by which the candidate, if elected, would fulfill the details of the campaign contract.
If the details are NOT fulfilled in a timely manner... somebody needs to figure out the punishment for the president under those circumstances... along with what will happen next.
The job of the President is important enough that the President should be executed if he doesn't do what he said in the contract. The Vice-President or whomever picks up the job should be held to the contract just like the President. Note that details need to be worked out.
Who will run for President under these requirements? Kamala might. But it would move the country into getting serious about what was going on in government.
![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)