Can we interpret this as "you don't take a profit from holding 'tainted' coins, but your LP takes that profit"?
We want to clarify that no one profits from holding these coins, directly or indirectly. Our liquidity providers are contractually obligated to return funds to the originating party or the appropriate authorities if the AML investigation requires it. The issue is not about generating profit, but about meeting legal and regulatory requirements.
Also, the scam accusation section is full of accusations that LPs still keep coins even after passing KYC. We will agree that this is bad behavior on the part of your LP. Will you, in any case, look for another solution, or will you continue to cooperate with them?
We are always on the client's side in contentious situations, but we, as well as our liquidity providers, must comply with the AML policy. We use the services of several liquidity providers. Please specify which specific case are you talking about?