Do you think a woman will make a better leader than a man?

[coolcoinz]

They usually have a team of advisors anyway, so a man that might be a better military leader and a better fighter will not make these decisions on his own. It's the same with a woman, who might be a weaker fighter and someone more easily frightened and bullied, but it's not the case in politics. She'll have a mixed team of men and women watching her every move, so there's no chance that would happen.
So, when it comes to a leader of a country it doesn't matter.

It's a bit different at work because there are certain jobs where male leaders excel. How many construction teams have you seen that were a group of men lead by a woman? On the other hand, how many daycare teachers are men?

[SAFGJX]

All the women I know are mentally ill, so no, they will not make good leaders and they should be trusted with as little as possible.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

If someone faces any difficult danger for the country, society or family, he can deal with it through his own wisdom and has some special qualities to lead, he is called a real leader. And these qualities can be achieved by any man or woman.
Due to which it can be said that both are perfect for leading. Currently, women are going a long way in terms of wisdom.

[jvanname]

If someone faces any difficult danger for the country, society or family, he can deal with it through his own wisdom and has some special qualities to lead, he is called a real leader. And these qualities can be achieved by any man or woman.
Due to which it can be said that both are perfect for leading. Currently, women are going a long way in terms of wisdom.

Right now, women are going to universities and obtaining worthless degrees. That makes them completely unrespectable because universities are extremely unprofessional.

Regards,

-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.

[Jewan420]

Male leadership and female leadership will never be the same in leadership. If women are chosen to lead nationally, the progress of that nation is almost impossible. If you look at those countries where women have chosen leadership, you will only see looting, immoral acts and acts against human rights in those countries. If you look at developed countries, you will see that female leadership is rare there. Even in powerful states, women do not accept leadership.

Men are created with the ability to lead by nature. Leading does not mean sitting and giving orders. Leading means that the leader will be first in some work and the people will follow him. The biggest responsibility of running the country is for men and the biggest responsibility of running the house is for women. Would you agree to make your wife stand in the line of men? For a woman to come to a leadership position, she has to come in the line of men and compete with them. Competing with the opposite sex is nothing but foolishness.

[iBaba]

They usually have a team of advisors anyway, so a man that might be a better military leader and a better fighter will not make these decisions on his own. It's the same with a woman, who might be a weaker fighter and someone more easily frightened and bullied, but it's not the case in politics. She'll have a mixed team of men and women watching her every move, so there's no chance that would happen.
So, when it comes to a leader of a country it doesn't matter.

It's a bit different at work because there are certain jobs where male leaders excel. How many construction teams have you seen that were a group of men lead by a woman? On the other hand, how many daycare teachers are men?

Even though we've seen the likes of Iraqi female architect, Zaha Hadid who has done tremendously well with their career in the construction industry as an industry leader in today's contemporary architectural realm. We've also seen iconic woment who have occupied strategic positions in the world of politics like Indira Ghandi who was the first female and the only female prime minister in India and a couple of more to mention. But after mentioning all of these, one will also want to ask, how many of these strategic positions have been occupied by women around the world and of what percentage?

If you fathom everything, you will have a reason to say that women are less decisive and strong-willed when it comes to making firm decisions in leading a congregation and the reason to this might not be far fectched from the fact that they are naturally people of emotions and are easily driven by those emotions in their decision making processes making it a bit difficult to rule over a diverse set of individuals in a given state or institution.

[Marvell1]

Male leadership and female leadership will never be the same in leadership. If women are chosen to lead nationally, the progress of that nation is almost impossible. If you look at those countries where women have chosen leadership, you will only see looting, immoral acts and acts against human rights in those countries. If you look at developed countries, you will see that female leadership is rare there. Even in powerful states, women do not accept leadership.

Men are created with the ability to lead by nature. Leading does not mean sitting and giving orders. Leading means that the leader will be first in some work and the people will follow him. The biggest responsibility of running the country is for men and the biggest responsibility of running the house is for women. Would you agree to make your wife stand in the line of men? For a woman to come to a leadership position, she has to come in the line of men and compete with them. Competing with the opposite sex is nothing but foolishness.

Although I agree with you that women are not better leaders than men, men are more suitable for this role than women, but not every country with female leaders is as bad as you say.

Angela Merkel is a talented chancellor and she has been awarded Germany's highest medal to honor individuals who have made great contributions to the country and society. She served for 16 years (4 terms) and successfully completed the task of developing and maintaining the German economy as the leading economy in Europe. Meanwhile, most other countries have male presidents or prime ministers, but the situation in those countries is also as bad as you mentioned.


Does your country have a male or female president and are you satisfied with what they have done?

https://www.politico.eu/article/angela-merkel-germany-grand-cross-of-the-order-of-merit-award-steinmeier/

[Gentle_Soul]

Although, gender status may not be consider as a factor that guarantee good leadership because good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge but I think a woman will make a better leader than a man because women are more rigid in terms decision making than men in so many ways and they less pose to distraction than men.
A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.

Over time men has always been world leaders I do not think there are no smarter woman than men but how ever if the task that comes with leadership can be severe on the man talk more of a woman. In leadership patience level can be tested people might also get on your nerves too if we can get who is fit enough and able to manage all these stress that comes with leadership then I am not against the idea of a female leader

[Roseline492]

Although, gender status may not be consider as a factor that guarantee good leadership because good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge but I think a woman will make a better leader than a man because women are more rigid in terms decision making than men in so many ways and they less pose to distraction than men.
A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.

In terms of manipulation it has nothing to do with genda because being manipulated is based on individual, there are men who can never be manipulated by anyone and the same goes to women but however men are easily more attracted to corruption than women, perhaps the reason why it seems so is that women are not mostly given the opportunity to lead in other for everyone to no whether they are more straightforward than men or not, so if women should be given more privileges to lead people can be able to tell, the problem with leadership is that if you do not have principles there are so many things that would influence your decisions.

[Felicity_Tide]

Although, gender status may not be consider as a factor that guarantee good leadership because good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge but I think a woman will make a better leader than a man because women are more rigid in terms decision making than men in so many ways and they less pose to distraction than men.
A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.

If I'm to stand on a neutral ground here, I think any of the gender (be it male or female), can be manipulated, and anyone can also be a leader. You've already stated some attributes of a good leader, but one last thing I will also like to add is truth and fairness. If you observe some of the mismanagement and failure that is happening in so many companies or organization that has a head, the supposed leaders are sometimes partial and are not truthful.

That aside, I think both genders are capable of being a leader, but the attributes that you mentioned, and the one I added will make them stand out.

And as for the question of the thread, well, I can't really say yes to this. Men are more dominant in most sectors, as we often see them more as a number one. Is not as if we don't have women that do this also, we can't just compare them to the men. But like I said, but genders can be a leader, but men are always prioritized most.

[Yucky]

Although, gender status may not be consider as a factor that guarantee good leadership because good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge but I think a woman will make a better leader than a man because women are more rigid in terms decision making than men in so many ways and they less pose to distraction than men.
A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.

It's that time we stop looking at factors that don't matter and focus on what's important when selecting a leader. It is this bias and blindness to gender that has caused more harm than good in country leadership and political offices.

When you see a qualified candidate, you should evaluate them based on experience, character, and other criteria that matter, rather than just looking at gender.

Because we prioritize gender and certain stereotypes, we keep going around in circles, blocking the way for people with potential to lead and instead putting individuals we think can lead based on their gender, whether male or female.

What matters is the capacity to lead, and the idea that a woman needs a man's support to rule, or vice versa, is outdated. A man needs a woman's support, as well as the support of other men. There is no effective leader without a team or chamber to consult.

So, does gender really matter? I know men and women are wired biologically differently, and that's where the beauty lies. We all have natural places we fit in. When it comes to leadership, capacity, experience, and character are what should be evaluated, rather than gender. That's all that matters.

[Swordsoffreedom]

It's that time we stop looking at factors that don't matter and focus on what's important when selecting a leader. It is this bias and blindness to gender that has caused more harm than good in country leadership and political offices.

When you see a qualified candidate, you should evaluate them based on experience, character, and other criteria that matter, rather than just looking at gender.

Because we prioritize gender and certain stereotypes, we keep going around in circles, blocking the way for people with potential to lead and instead putting individuals we think can lead based on their gender, whether male or female.

What matters is the capacity to lead, and the idea that a woman needs a man's support to rule, or vice versa, is outdated. A man needs a woman's support, as well as the support of other men. There is no effective leader without a team or chamber to consult.

So, does gender really matter? I know men and women are wired biologically differently, and that's where the beauty lies. We all have natural places we fit in. When it comes to leadership, capacity, experience, and character are what should be evaluated, rather than gender. That's all that matters.

What you say is not wrong but in reality not many people think like you or act like what you say. Especially for tycoons or politicians, they will not risk putting their trust in women because after all, women cannot be tougher and more decisive than men, and many issues women will never be able to compare with men.


It's true that some women will be stronger, more resilient, smarter...than men but if we do a random survey, men will always win. If women were really stronger and could compete directly with men, then perhaps gender discrimination would have been eliminated long ago.


Even in everyday life, how many women can take on the role of breadwinner and family pillar instead of men? How many women can endure what men endure physically and mentally...everything has its reasons.

[Zackz5000]

In my country side opportunity has not been given to women to rule we have been having a failed government right from onset I believe a woman will make a better leader if given the opportunity. But it doesn't really matter who is leading a better candidate should rule it doesn't matter what gender, what matters is how good you were able to lead your people I think that's what the poor masses need.
I know there are country where they have a woman as their president and the country is doing well, I have also seen countries where men are president and the country is doing bad so been a better leader all depends on individual difference. But in my country I believe a woman will do well because the old men leading us here has made things so difficult for the poor masses.

[HajiBagi]

Although, gender status may not be consider as a factor that guarantee good leadership because good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge but I think a woman will make a better leader than a man because women are more rigid in terms decision making than men in so many ways and they less pose to distraction than men.
A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.

I don't think women can make better leaders than men, don't even think of that because if a woman is going through many women will have been mad by now, it is not easy to be a man, even women know that to be a man is not easy, you are saying that women are more rigid in terms of decision making than men and a man can easily get manipulated by both men and women but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman, between man a woman who did you think is smart because the way I'm trading this you are trying to say that women are smart than a man.

If a woman handles what a man is she will know that to be a man is not easy, did you know that women are the Real evil? Women are not rigid when it comes to decision-making because they don't have the heart to make tough decisions, there are some decisions that a woman makes she would regret but a man is full of confidence and makes a good decision, any man that is a leader and you think he is being he being manipulated knows what he is doing unless he doesn't want to change.

[Rockstarguy]

Although, gender status may not be consider as a factor that guarantee good leadership because good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge but I think a woman will make a better leader than a man because women are more rigid in terms decision making than men in so many ways and they less pose to distraction than men.
A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.

Gender does not determine good leadership, good leadership can come from a woman and a man. Good leadership from anybody is determine by good character, understanding,  and exposure.  People are not not poor in leadership just because of the gender they belong to but bad leadership can be as a result of greed, corruption and lack of understanding in a woman or man. When it comes to good leadership there is no gender that is perfect for the job, it is is possible for anybody to have the qualities of a good leadership.

[Ricardo11]

Although, gender status may not be consider as a factor that guarantee good leadership because good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge but I think a woman will make a better leader than a man because women are more rigid in terms decision making than men in so many ways and they less pose to distraction than men.
A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.

It is true that good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge, but I do not think that women can be ahead of men in all these areas. Because men are much more intelligent and strategic than women, and men are able to take much more stress than women.
Moreover, it is not correct to consider "making tough decisions" or "being less distracted" as only female qualities, because men are not inferior in any way, even men can do it with better skills.
Success depends on the skills and qualities of a person, and in this case a man is more suitable than a woman.

[Rabata]

Although, gender status may not be consider as a factor that guarantee good leadership because good leadership comes from character, experience, wisdom and knowledge but I think a woman will make a better leader than a man because women are more rigid in terms decision making than men in so many ways and they less pose to distraction than men.
A man can be easily manipulated by both women and men but it's very difficult for a woman to manipulate her fellow woman.

I could not agree with your argument. Rather, I think that women may find it difficult to judge good and bad in taking decisions. But if a man is in leadership, it will be easier for them. Women are generally more emotional, but a man can comparatively analyze and take a good decision. Moreover, if we look at the leadership of big countries in the world, there are more men staying in power. Recently, we saw an election in America where women could not win the leadership. That is why I think that men are more suitable for leadership than women. There is no real example in the world where women have led better than men.

[NotATether]

I could not agree with your argument. Rather, I think that women may find it difficult to judge good and bad in taking decisions. But if a man is in leadership, it will be easier for them. Women are generally more emotional, but a man can comparatively analyze and take a good decision. Moreover, if we look at the leadership of big countries in the world, there are more men staying in power. Recently, we saw an election in America where women could not win the leadership. That is why I think that men are more suitable for leadership than women. There is no real example in the world where women have led better than men.

It's going to be different for each person.

Most men and women do not make for good leaders.

But some do. Men apparently more often than women.

But that doesn't mean it doesn't happen them as well.

To say that no woman can be a good leader is misogyny.