Stake.com signature campaign low quality but long writing posters

[Charles-Tim]

What do you think about this? Do you agree with me or do you think I'm wrong?

Just as other members have posted already, take a closer look at other signature campaigns and you will not notice any difference. Also worth mentioning that Stake also has one of the best posters and reputed members on this forum right now.

Also it is worth knowing that two of your recent complaints are not worth it. You complained about a thread that you know can not be moved to off-topi. And now you are complaining about a good signature campaign on this forum.

[Hazink]

Also it is worth knowing that two of your recent complaints are not worth it. You complained about a thread that you know can not be moved to off-topi. And now you are complaining about a good signature campaign on this forum.

In between, I just think that the Op is just being biased, as there is no campaign in this forum that doesn’t have 1, 2, or more shitposts. Even if they don’t shitpost regularly once in a while, they do make some shitposts just to complete the post quota.
 
If the OP sees anyone who is shitposting like the users who were quoted and indirectly called out, the best thing that I think could have been appreciated could have been to fish out those posts of that user that the OP considers shitposts and compile them in the thread instead of generalising the mistake of one person to the entire campaign promoters and the company itself.

[KingsDen]

Low quality and spam threads about stake campaign is not new in this forum. I have followed them up in the past. But I have an honest review about Stake campaign now. Things really changed. Text length no longer define post quality for them unlike before.

If it was when there's no improvement, posters like LUCKYMFLY or so will just write gigantic wall of texts in order to win a bonus or so. Things are changed, especially when they introduced a rating system and with the addition of igebotz in the team. Maybe addition of a few VIP users could completely change the narrative.

[Sanitough]

Maybe addition of a few VIP users could completely change the narrative.

I think this is one of the main reasons. These VIPs (we all know who they are) are highly reputable members of the forum, and they really care about keeping the place clean, especially when it comes to fighting spam. So they’re always pitching in ideas to improve things. I had no clue that @Igebotz, who’s a staff member here, is one of the raters - that says a lot. I mean, if a forum staff member is backing this campaign, it’s a clear sign it’s not a spam fest. They wouldn’t be in that position if they weren’t serious about enforcing the rules.

@Don Pedro Dinero, I get your concerns about the forum. But in this case, I feel like you could've acted a bit hastily. Just because you saw one person looking spammy doesn’t mean the whole campaign should be called out. Maybe the thread title could’ve been more specific, like calling out that one member rather than dragging the entire campaign down.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

@Don Pedro Dinero, I get your concerns about the forum. But in this case, I feel like you could've acted a bit hastily. Just because you saw one person looking spammy doesn’t mean the whole campaign should be called out. Maybe the thread title could’ve been more specific, like calling out that one member rather than dragging the entire campaign down.

No, it's not a person, rather the reason for this thread is that recently three people from that campaign have discussed things with me with lenghty posts and when I read what they had written I see that either they hadn't read what I said or they hadn't understood what I said.

But in view of the responses and the fact that there have already been other threads on the subject I am going to lock this one.