Red flag on Go-Go.exchange, seized $11K USDT of a user.

[examplens]

We expect you to verify KYC
This is not only our right but also a requirement of the regulator.

Can you share here the specific request of the regulator for freezing funds from the mentioned order in this case?

Dear colleagues and forum members, at the moment we have hired a company that is investigating this incident, we will resolve this situation in the near future.
Everyone present understands that this business is worth more than the funds that the client demands to return, but at the same time we cannot give in to manipulation from this client.

About manipulation.
If these are dirty coins that you have frozen, why were they sent further? Shouldn't they be locked until the user passes KYC?

[Denis_Verbinsky]

Dear client, no one has stolen anything from you.
We expect you to verify KYC
This is not only our right but also a requirement of the regulator.
The fact that you do not pass verification speaks of your intention to defame us.
Dear colleagues and forum members, at the moment we have hired a company that is investigating this incident, we will resolve this situation in the near future.
Everyone present understands that this business is worth more than the funds that the client demands to return, but at the same time we cannot give in to manipulation from this client.
The issue is not about money, but about ensuring that this incident does not happen again, and this is not the first case with this client. A few weeks ago we had a similar situation with him.
We are forced to take such steps to protect ourselves in the future.
Everyone understands and knows that the requirements of the KYC / AML policy are mandatory and the client agreed to them even before creating the application.
With respect and until next time, the Go-Go team

I do not intend to provide my personal data to you.

You have still not shown any proof of your accusations.

I do not intend to provide my personal data to an exchanger that changes its rules after I have made an exchange and requires verification under the changed invalid agreements.

I will not back down until my you give me my coins back.

And this is my only exchange on your site, so stop coming up with more excuses to continue blocking my funds.

If I may ask, if they are going to pay you assuming you pass KYC, why wouldn't you just give them the KYC and get your money back? I don't know if they will or won't pay you, but if that's the option i'm given or lose my money, I'll bite the bullet and give my KYC.

1. I do not want to provide my personal data.
2. Considering all the factors:
2.1. The exchanger has already changed the reason for the KYC requirement three times
2.2. The exchanger does not provide any evidence regarding the regulator's requirement or anything else.
2.3. The exchanger changes the current AML policy on its website after the situation happened so that it fits their requirements
I really do not believe that these coins are really blocked. I think they will find a bunch of other reasons not to return them. For example, they will ask for something else, then something
else, then something else... I have seen such cases on bestchange, where exchangers endlessly demand additional data and do not return the coins for years.
3. I am not going to be a part of their puzzle, in which any user can be left with frozen coins even though these coins are absolutely clean.
3.1. I hope that I can change something and at my reception other users will know that they have the security of personal data and that the inventions of exchangers will not affect this.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I have seen such cases on bestchange, where exchangers endlessly demand additional data and do not return the coins for years.

Strange logic. You have seen similar cases on this aggregator; nevertheless, you choose an exchanger from its list and exchange the whole thing. Moreover, the duration of its work does not seem long(8 months), so you can trust both experience and reviews. On bestchange, there are exchangers that have proven themselves for 8 years, isn't that worth trusting?

3.1. I hope that I can change something and at my reception other users will know that they have the security of personal data and that the inventions of exchangers will not affect this.

I don't want to take sides, but you can't change something that's been set up and working for years.

Description of service
For visitors planning to exchange cryptocurrency, the BestChange website offers the option to perform an AML check of the crypto address from which or to which funds are intended to be sent.

The AML analyzer allows users to verify addresses for both native cryptocurrencies (such as BTC, ETH, LTC, TRON) and tokens — assets created via smart contracts on existing blockchains. Various networks are supported, including ERC20, TRC20, and BEP20 token standards.

https://www.bestchange.com/report/

[Denis_Verbinsky]

I have seen such cases on bestchange, where exchangers endlessly demand additional data and do not return the coins for years.

Strange logic. You have seen similar cases on this aggregator; nevertheless, you choose an exchanger from its list and exchange the whole thing. Moreover, the duration of its work does not seem long(8 months), so you can trust both experience and reviews. On bestchange, there are exchangers that have proven themselves for 8 years, isn't that worth trusting?

Yes, I already realized that I made a mistake. As I said, I relied on 130 positive reviews and only one resolved financial claim. For me, that seemed enough.

But thanks, I'll be more careful in the future.

[The Cryptovator]

Dear client, no one has stolen anything from you.
We expect you to verify KYC
This is not only our right but also a requirement of the regulator.

Really regret to see you repeating the same things. Please mention which regulation asked for KYC and what the reason is. You claim you aren't stealing, but it seems you are doing that. We expect to refund the funds to the same address since the victim really doesn't want to proceed with KYC.

Dear colleagues and forum members, at the moment we have hired a company that is investigating this incident, we will resolve this situation in the near future.

Why do you freeze the funds if you aren't sure of the issue? What kind of investigation are you expecting when the funds are clean and it has been proven?

Everyone present understands that this business is worth more than the funds that the client demands to return, but at the same time we cannot give in to manipulation from this client.
The issue is not about money, but about ensuring that this incident does not happen again, and this is not the first case with this client. A few weeks ago we had a similar situation with him.
We are forced to take such steps to protect ourselves in the future.

Definitely you have to protect yourself when the funds are linked with the dirty sources. I don't feel Whitebit is the dirty source of funds anyway. What do you really mean by manipulation? If you want to not repeat this kind of incident, then ask for KYC before proceeding with the exchange. Require registration and verify users. KYC

Everyone understands and knows that the requirements of the KYC / AML policy are mandatory and the client agreed to them even before creating the application.
With respect and until next time, the Go-Go team

I admit it, and the victim admits as well regarding the mistake made by him. So accept his apologies and release the funds. It will help to refrain your reputation.

[uche6215]

Snip

From what I have read in the KYC ToS, it is clear to me that the exchange is to scam users.  and probably the number 8 had been used against many.

https://www.go-go.exchange/en/rules/aml-kyc-policy/
Op thanks for this warning.

[Denis_Verbinsky]

Hello everyone, it's me again.

The exchanger accuses me of fraud, sends some screenshots and says that these are supposedly my exchanges and I have already received the money. This is complete nonsense.

They just continue to operate with more and more new fantasies.

The most surprising thing is that they are still getting in touch, because their traffic became zero after being removed from bestchange. Yes, maybe they really do continue to profit from those 2-3 clients who make exchanges with them every day. But this is just a nightmare, considering how they treated me.

[lovesmayfamilis]

There is information about their team on the Internet (and it is not impressive at all).
https://cryptorussia.ru/go-go-exchange-moshennichestvo
I think that those six people who organized their "service" have long divided your money. It is sad that they deceived you, but to say that you should be careful in the future is just rubbing salt in the wound (sorry). The amount is quite large; I do not know if you will find the strength to tell on the Internet about their actions, but I think you have warned the forum users, although what does this mean for you when you still cannot return anything.

[examplens]

There is information about their team on the Internet (and it is not impressive at all).
https://cryptorussia.ru/go-go-exchange-moshennichestvo

This review is quite uncritical and does not provide much other than basic information. Also, it is quite outdated, because go-go scammers have been disabled on Bestchange monitoring for some time.

The amount is quite large; I do not know if you will find the strength to tell on the Internet about their actions, but I think you have warned the forum users, although what does this mean for you when you still cannot return anything.

Denis shook them up quite a bit with the presentation of his case. I've seen it in several places. Enough that they are now attributing the whole case to competitor attacks.

[lovesmayfamilis]

There is information about their team on the Internet (and it is not impressive at all).
https://cryptorussia.ru/go-go-exchange-moshennichestvo

This review is quite uncritical and does not provide much other than basic information. Also, it is quite outdated, because go-go scammers have been disabled on Bestchange monitoring for some time.

The amount is quite large; I do not know if you will find the strength to tell on the Internet about their actions, but I think you have warned the forum users, although what does this mean for you when you still cannot return anything.

Denis shook them up quite a bit with the presentation of his case. I've seen it in several places. Enough that they are now attributing the whole case to competitor attacks.

I don't believe in fake reviews, but there are real reviews below on the page that speak negatively about the exchanger. And yes, the information is old, but someone who was a scoundrel for a long time is unlikely to become honest after a while. I would have read the old review without thinking and passed by without expecting any changes.