no, i dont think this is anyone in this topic. but what i have seen already is that the people that are part of that website are glory hounds. for example, the HMRC already were looking into bitcoin for 2 years. i was even informed of the (at the time unofficial) plan/theory they had to categorize bitcoin in relation to tax this time last year. yet the association have kind of hyped the HMRC announcement, as being done due to them.
im all for people talking to HMRC but when they pretend to be doing the hard work of others, then i start to wonder if they are worth paying a membership fee.
i personally would rather people just do the work and get paid a bounty for doing it. rather then accepting a wage and twist all news related to bitcoin UK, to be done by them.
i am at the moment in a holding pattern to see what the next plan the DCA have, and to see what news they report as being done by them is actually done by them.
we dont want a dozen coders saying they are going to be involved with legal or media projects. so i hope DCA has proper expertise in all area's
what we dont want is to be paying for a group of guys that dont work. and letting others that do work to go unheard and unrewarded. so im not going to join the DCA at this point as i dont see them doing much/anything to improve the UK bitcoin ecosphere.
pretenders taking the glory will hurt bitcoins integrity and perception, we definetly dont want to ruin bitcoins potential for mainstream
i think the DCA need to atleast disclose all their board/employee's along with the expertise they have and a list of current projects, rather then board "subjects" they wish to cover