Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 06:42:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: client command line option -wallet= in addition to -datadir=? REDUX  (Read 1014 times)
keystroke (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 900
Merit: 1014


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
April 01, 2013, 05:20:10 PM
 #1

Didn't want to post in the old thread as it has been 120 days since the last post there....

It would be nice to have a --walletdir option to specify where the wallet is. That way we can put the wallet in an encrypted volume and leave the blockchain elsewhere.

Has this been implemented? I see some people are using symlinks but that is still a pain under Windows (especially with multiple wallets).

If a patch were written would it be easy to get it merged into the client?

Thanks.

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
wumpus
Hero Member
*****
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1022

No Maps for These Territories


View Profile
April 01, 2013, 05:36:18 PM
 #2

Yes, would be useful, -walletdir has been proposed before:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/68

It used to be a problem that both the block chain and the wallet use bdb, which shared one database directory with log files. But now that the block chain is no longer in berkeleydb it is possible to add this option.

Bitcoin Core developer [PGP] Warning: For most, coin loss is a larger risk than coin theft. A disk can die any time. Regularly back up your wallet through FileBackup Wallet to an external storage or the (encrypted!) cloud. Use a separate offline wallet for storing larger amounts.
keystroke (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 900
Merit: 1014


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
April 01, 2013, 06:54:13 PM
 #3

Yes, would be useful, -walletdir has been proposed before:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/68

It used to be a problem that both the block chain and the wallet use bdb, which shared one database directory with log files. But now that the block chain is no longer in berkeleydb it is possible to add this option.

Thanks and good point. I see the issue is open so I made a comment there.

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
Stephen Gornick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010


View Profile
April 01, 2013, 08:57:41 PM
 #4

Thanks and good point. I see the issue is open so I made a comment there.

And to replicate the response from there:

gmaxwell commented:
@keystrike it's likely going to get subsumed by the multiple wallet support.

Unichange.me

            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █


keystroke (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 900
Merit: 1014


advocate of a cryptographic attack on the globe


View Profile
April 02, 2013, 01:49:50 AM
 #5

Thanks and good point. I see the issue is open so I made a comment there.

And to replicate the response from there:

gmaxwell commented:
@keystrike it's likely going to get subsumed by the multiple wallet support.


Looks like they are well on their way: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2124

"The difference between a castle and a prison is only a question of who holds the keys."
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!