So I've noticed that some Scrypt pools that mine the same coin at about the same hash rate do not find a similar # of blocks (this is over a decent period of time - so its not the whole variance bad luck thing).
I've even seen some pools at a low hash rate (in the 200-300Mh/s range) do much better than a pool at a higher hash rate (2x to 3x as much). This would be for coins that have an average hash rate of 500Mh/s to 1Gh/s.
There must be other variables when it comes to alt coin mining pool optimization? Are there any special tweaks?
Or special nodes that one pool may have access to and the others do not?
Could it just be latency?
Or the # of miners at one time?
Just curious - as not all pools are doing the same - even though the hashes stated would predict otherwise.
it depends on the net hashrate, if the nethashrate is large compared to the pool hashrate you can't exclude variance...
(after there are pool that cheat
if you have doubt and if the pool is way too unlucky, you might try to look at the address on the pool in a block finder, and check that the number of block found by the pool address is the same as the one reported on their website...).
I think latency should rather affect on the miner side meaning you would get more rejected... and smaller difficulty shares.
Could be also some bad difficulty tuning causing wrong hashrate to be reported by the pool (not really frequent if the algo is well known) etc...