Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 04:48:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: CIA Activity in the Bitcoin Ecosystem  (Read 2086 times)
Vladimir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1001


-


View Profile
August 07, 2012, 11:48:03 AM
 #21

Didn't you know? Satoshi Nakamoto is a code name for their "past fed funding project"! It like a full department of PhD's.


-
Bitcoin Oz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Wat


View Profile WWW
August 07, 2012, 11:52:18 AM
 #22

I wouldnt be surprised if pirate is CIA in which case they are attempting to cheaply buy all the bitcoins  Smiley

PayPal
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
August 07, 2012, 01:44:43 PM
 #23

I am the CIA! Bow down to my supremacy, and grovel for my marketshare!
doobadoo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 07, 2012, 03:52:42 PM
 #24

I wonder how much damage they could do by buying large amounts of coins and then selling them off in an attempt to create and pop bubbles.

Wouldn't work.  They people "in" on it would likely front run the op.  Also be a hard use of funds to justify, would smell too much like banking agency cash into their own pockets.  But then again, thats how a lot of government works: figuring out ways to bank public funds into private pockets.

"It is, quite honestly, the biggest challenge to central banking since Andrew Jackson." -evoorhees
doobadoo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 07, 2012, 03:56:50 PM
 #25

You've got to remember that bitcoin is small-fry.

If it wasn't, it would be an absolutely trivial matter for a US governmental agency to use a 51% attack or something similar to bring down the network. They have some of the brightest minds in coding, and a eleven-figure budgets, we wouldn't stand a chance.

You give "them" too much credit.  I know they look good right now, you know landing that SUV on the Martian surface and all.  But the fact remains: the current hash rate of Bitcoin greatly exceeds the power of the fastest know supercomputer.   Additionally, a 51% attack doesn't destroy Bitcoin outright.  It only allows them to interfere with the generation of new blocks, eg, they can block transactions and monopolize the block reward.   In *theory* many miners would drop once they hit a point that it became futile to mine (eg, a SUSTAINED 51%+ attack), but i got a feeling that people dont' like getting rolled and you'd see hash rates rise to whatever challenge threatens Bitcoin!

"It is, quite honestly, the biggest challenge to central banking since Andrew Jackson." -evoorhees
CoinCidental
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000


Si vis pacem, para bellum


View Profile
August 07, 2012, 04:38:53 PM
 #26

You've got to remember that bitcoin is small-fry.

If it wasn't, it would be an absolutely trivial matter for a US governmental agency to use a 51% attack or something similar to bring down the network. They have some of the brightest minds in coding, and a eleven-figure budgets, we wouldn't stand a chance.

You give "them" too much credit.  I know they look good right now, you know landing that SUV on the Martian surface and all.  But the fact remains: the current hash rate of Bitcoin greatly exceeds the power of the fastest know supercomputer.   Additionally, a 51% attack doesn't destroy Bitcoin outright.  It only allows them to interfere with the generation of new blocks, eg, they can block transactions and monopolize the block reward.   In *theory* many miners would drop once they hit a point that it became futile to mine (eg, a SUSTAINED 51%+ attack), but i got a feeling that people dont' like getting rolled and you'd see hash rates rise to whatever challenge threatens Bitcoin!

If people (like minder in the btc community ) had more hashing power ,why would they wait until an attack ?
they could just  add that power to the network now and take the rewards ?
Shadow383
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 08, 2012, 09:11:48 AM
 #27

You've got to remember that bitcoin is small-fry.

If it wasn't, it would be an absolutely trivial matter for a US governmental agency to use a 51% attack or something similar to bring down the network. They have some of the brightest minds in coding, and a eleven-figure budgets, we wouldn't stand a chance.

You give "them" too much credit.  I know they look good right now, you know landing that SUV on the Martian surface and all.  But the fact remains: the current hash rate of Bitcoin greatly exceeds the power of the fastest know supercomputer.   Additionally, a 51% attack doesn't destroy Bitcoin outright.  It only allows them to interfere with the generation of new blocks, eg, they can block transactions and monopolize the block reward.   In *theory* many miners would drop once they hit a point that it became futile to mine (eg, a SUSTAINED 51%+ attack), but i got a feeling that people dont' like getting rolled and you'd see hash rates rise to whatever challenge threatens Bitcoin!
I'm just saying, if a company as small as butterfly labs can knock up a hundred terahash in ASICs for a few million and several months' work, then so can just about any government agency.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!