Crave Native I2P

[Yaremi]

Crave Native I2P:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=997356.msg11236382#msg11236382

Boom!

[Jazzycrypt]

wow, bro! thats amazing. It seems, that Crave is going to stable TOP-5 altcoin market in a few monthes! I predict more than 4.000.000$ crave marketcap till september 2015. We'll see. I'm out at 210K sat, and i'm in again at this price. 

[fishy91]

Wow! 

its first!

I know you can run bitcoin through tor, so it can most likely run through I2P too.

[YarkoL]

It's not first, Anoncoin had i2p already in 2013.
It also has native Tor, so the user can choose between
the two.

The choice to limit the network to i2p only is from
the anonymity standpoint, a bad idea. i2p, although
in some respects more advanced than Tor, is just not
yet mature enough to support user privacy on the same
level as Tor does.

[Wheatclove]

It's not first, Anoncoin had i2p already in 2013.
It also has native Tor, so the user can choose between
the two.

The choice to limit the network to i2p only is from
the anonymity standpoint, a bad idea. i2p, although
in some respects more advanced than Tor, is just not
yet mature enough to support user privacy on the same
level as Tor does.

Actually, I believe div built native i2p for bitcoin in 2013 and anoncoin implemented his code after that.

It even says copyright div in the sourcecode. Cravedev didn't even change the default tunnel name.

[rocoro]

It's not first, Anoncoin had i2p already in 2013.
It also has native Tor, so the user can choose between
the two.

The choice to limit the network to i2p only is from
the anonymity standpoint, a bad idea. i2p, although
in some respects more advanced than Tor, is just not
yet mature enough to support user privacy on the same
level as Tor does.

Actually, I believe div built native i2p for bitcoin in 2013 and anoncoin implemented his code after that.

It even says copyright div in the sourcecode. Cravedev didn't even change the default tunnel name.

What is div ?  what is the full name

[Wheatclove]

It's not first, Anoncoin had i2p already in 2013.
It also has native Tor, so the user can choose between
the two.

The choice to limit the network to i2p only is from
the anonymity standpoint, a bad idea. i2p, although
in some respects more advanced than Tor, is just not
yet mature enough to support user privacy on the same
level as Tor does.

Actually, I believe div built native i2p for bitcoin in 2013 and anoncoin implemented his code after that.

It even says copyright div in the sourcecode. Cravedev didn't even change the default tunnel name.

What is div ?  what is the full name

He goes by div. He's a member of this forum

[rocoro]

It's not first, Anoncoin had i2p already in 2013.
It also has native Tor, so the user can choose between
the two.

The choice to limit the network to i2p only is from
the anonymity standpoint, a bad idea. i2p, although
in some respects more advanced than Tor, is just not
yet mature enough to support user privacy on the same
level as Tor does.

Actually, I believe div built native i2p for bitcoin in 2013 and anoncoin implemented his code after that.

It even says copyright div in the sourcecode. Cravedev didn't even change the default tunnel name.

Oh, I thought it was a coin name...  thanks.


What is div ?  what is the full name

He goes by div. He's a member of this forum
 

Oh, I thought it was a coin name... thanks