Here's an interesting National Review article about people who are confused about money.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/418926/bernie-sanderss-dark-age-economics-kevin-d-williamsonBitcoin gets mentioned a couple of times (but not at all discussed). The mentions seem to be positive. It's interesting to see further evidence of Bitcoin penetrating a relatively mainstream publication like NR.
The full article is very good. Here are the two passages in which Bitcoin is mentioned.
That $484 is easily expressed in non-U.S. dollar contexts: €445.08, £ 314.56, ¥ 5,9573.87, 2.0349 Bitcoin. (Damn!)
Money is a medium of exchange, and prices are a form of communication. What do prices communicate? How much we value certain things relative to other things. This is really helpful: Everything in the economy is in reality priced in terms of other things — everything is relative to everything else — and price tags would look like the Library of Congress if we had to list the price of an airline ticket in wheat, coffee, gold, Bitcoins, signed Andy Warhol prints, Hermès scarves, etc. The underlying hierarchy of relative preferences does not change if you go from U.S. dollars to Swiss francs; you can play with the means of exchange all you like, but you’ll never arrive at a place at which people value a No. 2 pencil (the miraculous No. 2 pencil!) as much as they do a Rolls Royce automobile.
