Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 11:15:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: what about allowing an owner to lock BTC to an address for a period of time?  (Read 3437 times)
benjamindees
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 07, 2012, 10:02:45 AM
 #41

Newly mined coins aren't valid until 100 blocks have passed
...
Also, you end up with a race if the reorg goes back to before the script would have become valid, which might only be two or three blocks, which happen on a regular basis already when there is no practical way to profit from them.

So, theoretically, couldn't the same limit be placed on spending the output of a time locked transaction, to prevent this?

Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
MysteryMiner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1042


Death to enemies!


View Profile
September 07, 2012, 12:11:37 PM
 #42

Censorship is like Michael Jackson's anal bleaching - at some point it got out of control.
lol, I like that one is that your creation?
Partially. I added the censorship thing to this, the MJ bleaching was probably from efukt.com long time ago.
If your bitcoins are stolen this is your and only your fault!

Of course, the thief is totally innocent.  Roll Eyes
This is how computers work. Some people are smarter and makes computers to do unexpected things for amusement or abusement. Get over it or return to using mechanical Iron Felix.

To original topic - the time locked transactions are possible right now - the coins are locked from spending for approx 10 minutes until they are in a block. I dont see any need for Bitcoin to to all sorts of things for any life situation. Bitcoins are purely for transactions, use web based services such as mybitcoin.com or mtgox for any additional "features" such as freezing your own coins from withdrawal and so on.

bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
kjj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1025



View Profile
September 07, 2012, 01:04:52 PM
 #43

Newly mined coins aren't valid until 100 blocks have passed
...
Also, you end up with a race if the reorg goes back to before the script would have become valid, which might only be two or three blocks, which happen on a regular basis already when there is no practical way to profit from them.

So, theoretically, couldn't the same limit be placed on spending the output of a time locked transaction, to prevent this?

Right now, you can validate a block with no prior knowledge of any of the transactions in it.  If you are thinking what I think you are thinking, it would require that every node have perfect knowledge of all transactions on the network before it could be sure a block was valid.  Or maybe you are thinking something else, I'm not sure.

17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs.  You should too.
MysteryMiner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1042


Death to enemies!


View Profile
September 07, 2012, 01:12:46 PM
 #44

You are thinking how to make hammer work also as a saw.

bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
benjamindees
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 08, 2012, 10:05:02 AM
 #45

You are thinking how to make hammer work also as a saw.

It's a useful skill.


Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!