|
Nolo (OP)
|
 |
November 27, 2012, 04:22:11 AM
Last edit: November 29, 2012, 10:46:01 PM by Nolo |
|
Well do you, punk?
Instructions:
1) PM me or post in this thread saying "I want to play!"
2) I will PM you with a bitcoin address.
3) Send up to .50 BTC in .01 increments to that address.
Whoever sends the highest amount, will receive a prize of 1 BTC.
But here's the catch: If two people send the same amount, they knock each other out, and neither will win.
If 3 people pay the same amount, the first two knock each other out, but the third person's payment is still valid.
Example: If the following amounts are sent:
1) .35
2) .48
3) .48
4) .21
Then the person that sent .35 will win.
Please make sure that just like satoshidice, the address you send with is capable of receiving the winning 1 BTC.
I will announce the winning address, and send the winning 1 BTC, as soon as I have received atleast 1.1 BTC.
Also if you win, please post back here in the thread so you can gloat and personally be congratulated!
Round 1: Currently in progress......
|
Charlie Kelly: I'm pleading the 5th. The Attorney: I would advise you do that. Charlie Kelly: I'll take that advice under cooperation, alright? Now, let's say you and I go toe-to-toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor? The Attorney: You know, I don't think I'm going to do anything close to that and I can clearly see you know nothing about the law.
19GpqFsNGP8jS941YYZZjmCSrHwvX3QjiC
|
|
|
|
Nolo (OP)
|
|
November 27, 2012, 05:06:14 PM |
|
I'll bump the thread. Round 1 still in progress. Haven't made it to 1.1 BTC yet. As soon as I do, someone's getting paid  |
Charlie Kelly: I'm pleading the 5th. The Attorney: I would advise you do that. Charlie Kelly: I'll take that advice under cooperation, alright? Now, let's say you and I go toe-to-toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor? The Attorney: You know, I don't think I'm going to do anything close to that and I can clearly see you know nothing about the law.
19GpqFsNGP8jS941YYZZjmCSrHwvX3QjiC
|
|
|
|
Nolo (OP)
|
|
November 28, 2012, 11:18:57 PM |
|
Come on guys, help me finish at least one round of this game lol.
|
Charlie Kelly: I'm pleading the 5th. The Attorney: I would advise you do that. Charlie Kelly: I'll take that advice under cooperation, alright? Now, let's say you and I go toe-to-toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor? The Attorney: You know, I don't think I'm going to do anything close to that and I can clearly see you know nothing about the law.
19GpqFsNGP8jS941YYZZjmCSrHwvX3QjiC
|
|
|
|
caffeinewriter
|
|
November 29, 2012, 09:11:12 PM |
|
What happens if a 3rd person pays the same amount? Do they take the place of the two that were knocked out?
|
|
|
|
|
Nolo (OP)
|
|
November 29, 2012, 10:45:24 PM |
|
What happens if a 3rd person pays the same amount? Do they take the place of the two that were knocked out?
Good point. A rare event I would think, but possible. In that case, that's what I'll do. New rule: If 3 people pay the same amount, the first two knock each other out, but the third person's payment is still valid. |
Charlie Kelly: I'm pleading the 5th. The Attorney: I would advise you do that. Charlie Kelly: I'll take that advice under cooperation, alright? Now, let's say you and I go toe-to-toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor? The Attorney: You know, I don't think I'm going to do anything close to that and I can clearly see you know nothing about the law.
19GpqFsNGP8jS941YYZZjmCSrHwvX3QjiC
|
|
|
|
Nolo (OP)
|
|
December 05, 2012, 03:26:16 AM |
|
Still stuck in the first round. lol....I figured this would be more popular than it has turned out to be  |
Charlie Kelly: I'm pleading the 5th. The Attorney: I would advise you do that. Charlie Kelly: I'll take that advice under cooperation, alright? Now, let's say you and I go toe-to-toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor? The Attorney: You know, I don't think I'm going to do anything close to that and I can clearly see you know nothing about the law.
19GpqFsNGP8jS941YYZZjmCSrHwvX3QjiC
|
|
|
|
Merralea
|
|
February 24, 2013, 06:59:34 PM |
|
Nash equilibrium (very loose use of the term, I know) for this is for everyone to send .5 BTC. There must be at least three players for the round to have a winner, so the best possible chance to double one's money is 1/3.
1/3 chance of 2x input is so obviously -EV that the game is unenticing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nolo (OP)
|
|
February 24, 2013, 11:02:41 PM |
|
Nash equilibrium (very loose use of the term, I know) for this is for everyone to send .5 BTC. There must be at least three players for the round to have a winner, so the best possible chance to double one's money is 1/3.
1/3 chance of 2x input is so obviously -EV that the game is unenticing.
I should have locked this thread.... was letting it die. |
Charlie Kelly: I'm pleading the 5th. The Attorney: I would advise you do that. Charlie Kelly: I'll take that advice under cooperation, alright? Now, let's say you and I go toe-to-toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor? The Attorney: You know, I don't think I'm going to do anything close to that and I can clearly see you know nothing about the law.
19GpqFsNGP8jS941YYZZjmCSrHwvX3QjiC
|
|
|
|
