Neg Trust ~

[KWH]

for selling an account you should get neutral trust pointing it out. however, the negative trust is not related to selling so...

So, unless a negative is specifically related to a sale, it is to be disregarded?

[shorena]

for selling an account you should get neutral trust pointing it out. however, the negative trust is not related to selling so...

... the "new" owner of the TF account[1] should get all the feedback removed?

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67058

[tss]

for selling an account you should get neutral trust pointing it out. however, the negative trust is not related to selling so...

... the "new" owner of the TF account[1] should get all the feedback removed?

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67058

haha.. nice one.

it is not against the rules to buy and sell accounts only because it is impossible to control these actions.

any account that openly admits to being bought or sold should be left neutral or negative trust pointing out it is not as trustworthy as it would like you to think. 

[shorena]

for selling an account you should get neutral trust pointing it out. however, the negative trust is not related to selling so...

... the "new" owner of the TF account[1] should get all the feedback removed?

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67058

haha.. nice one.

it is not against the rules to buy and sell accounts only because it is impossible to control these actions.

any account that openly admits to being bought or sold should be left neutral or negative trust pointing out it is not as trustworthy as it would like you to think. 

Again, so a scammer can just "openly admit" that the account was "sold" and get all the negative feedback removed? Is that what you are suggesting here?

[tss]

for selling an account you should get neutral trust pointing it out. however, the negative trust is not related to selling so...

... the "new" owner of the TF account[1] should get all the feedback removed?

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67058

haha.. nice one.

it is not against the rules to buy and sell accounts only because it is impossible to control these actions.

any account that openly admits to being bought or sold should be left neutral or negative trust pointing out it is not as trustworthy as it would like you to think. 

Again, so a scammer can just "openly admit" that the account was "sold" and get all the negative feedback removed? Is that what you are suggesting here?

the exact opposite.
no removal of any old trust.
any account known to be bought or sold should be marked with more feeedback. 
accounts with no trust or positive trust need to be left negative as they are no longer in control of the original person who actually earned the positive trust.

[shorena]

-snip-

the exact opposite.
no removal of any old trust.
any account known to be bought or sold should be marked with more feeedback. 
accounts with no trust or positive trust need to be left negative as they are no longer in control of the original person who actually earned the positive trust.

Ah, I get it now. I think it was common for a while to mark sold accounts as such.