Should SatoshiRoulette.com add PPC support

[Liquid]

i will help test

[El Cabron]

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

[Nicksasa]

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

Sure looks like it ...

[Este Nuno]

Have you ever considered that you might be wasting your time with all this PPCoin implementation stuff?

I actually think you have a pretty good idea going and have been doing a good job in general with your website. You seem to have found a nice niche between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling.

You have implemented many new games at a good pace, but I think your site could still improve a lot. It could use some polish, and if I remember correctly there seemed to be a decent amount of typos and such.

I really think there is tons of potential for your site. The bitcoin gaming market is really young and surprisingly weak considering bitcoin completely solves the payment processing issue.

Anyway, good luck with your site and keep up the good work.

[smoothie]

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

Really? Any proof? I wasn't paying attention to this PISS thread.

[SRoulette]

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

We edited it for laughs, pray we do not edit it any further.

But seriously We were after an expression of interest and hopefully some feedback on why it may not be welcome just now (as we did with Devcoin). As all nay sayers no failed to back up their position, their votes from out perspective is irrelevant.

No == Yes of Course

Have you ever considered that you might be wasting your time with all this PPCoin implementation stuff?

I actually think you have a pretty good idea going and have been doing a good job in general with your website. You seem to have found a nice niche between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling.

You have implemented many new games at a good pace, but I think your site could still improve a lot. It could use some polish, and if I remember correctly there seemed to be a decent amount of typos and such.

I really think there is tons of potential for your site. The bitcoin gaming market is really young and surprisingly weak considering bitcoin completely solves the payment processing issue.

Anyway, good luck with your site and keep up the good work.

Each alt currency has proved quite valuable in testing and developing our engine.
So from a development POV yes it really is worth supporting or at least privately testing an alt currency with our engine.

Thanks for the really positive feed back and yes "between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling" is our business plan to a tee

We still have a long way to go but these past 3 months have been an Excellent Adventure and we intend to keep increasing the site appearance and game offerings.

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

Really? Any proof? I wasn't paying attention to this PISS thread.

Proof == Yes we did

We changed no votes to a 2nd yes.

[El Cabron]

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

We edited it for laughs, pray we do not edit it any further.

But seriously We were after an expression of interest and hopefully some feedback on why it may not be welcome just now (as we did with Devcoin). As all nay sayers no failed to back up their position, their votes from out perspective is irrelevant.

No == Yes of Course

Have you ever considered that you might be wasting your time with all this PPCoin implementation stuff?

I actually think you have a pretty good idea going and have been doing a good job in general with your website. You seem to have found a nice niche between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling.

You have implemented many new games at a good pace, but I think your site could still improve a lot. It could use some polish, and if I remember correctly there seemed to be a decent amount of typos and such.

I really think there is tons of potential for your site. The bitcoin gaming market is really young and surprisingly weak considering bitcoin completely solves the payment processing issue.

Anyway, good luck with your site and keep up the good work.

Each alt currency has proved quite valuable in testing and developing our engine.
So from a development POV yes it really is worth supporting or at least privately testing an alt currency with our engine.

Thanks for the really positive feed back and yes "between bare bones SatoshiDice style send-and-done style gambling and standard online casino style gambling" is our business plan to a tee

We still have a long way to go but these past 3 months have been an Excellent Adventure and we intend to keep increasing the site appearance and game offerings.

you edited the poll after people voted to give you the results you were looking for?

Really? Any proof? I wasn't paying attention to this PISS thread.

Proof == Yes we did

We changed no votes to a 2nd yes.

At least you admit it but you still get a face palm...

[SRoulette]

At least you admit it but you still get a face palm...

Not everyone shares my cheeky of humor I guess 

[El Cabron]

At least you admit it but you still get a face palm...

Not everyone shares my cheeky of humor I guess 

Seems like a scam to me.

I do not at all like dishonest people.

[SRoulette]

At least you admit it but you still get a face palm...

Not everyone shares my cheeky of humor I guess  

Seems like a scam to me.

I do not at all like dishonest people.

I think your English skills fail you Chaang.
You are mis-using the definition of scam and I am nor am or have been dishonest.
I have reverted it back the polls to avoid further confusing you.

What you fail to appreciate is the no votes have no bearing on the decision because key members of the PPC community contacted me specifically requesting addition.
You and others voting no had no influence on the decision made, the only votes we were interested in is Yes votes, hence 1 no and 2 joke polls.