Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 07:36:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2015-09-21] TechCrunch: A Solution to Bitcoin's Governance Problem  (Read 800 times)
bloods-n-cryptos (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 129
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 24, 2015, 05:43:52 PM
 #1

A Solution to Bitcoin's Governance Problem

http://techcrunch.com/2015/09/21/a-solution-to-bitcoins-governance-problem/

All the developers agree that the strategy of forking the main software is less than ideal, but where they disagree is that both sets of developers feel that they are acting in the best interests of Bitcoin users. As a result, the solution to this disagreement lies in the same principles that govern corporations, a vote by stakeholders weighted by their respective stakes.

I'm curious what the people from the world's biggest democracy think about the aforementioned proposal?

The big difference I see is that rather than each person getting one vote, voting is based on how much you actually own.

Any information provided in my posts is for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice, but you already knew that.
BTCIndia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

vini, vedi, no vici.


View Profile
September 24, 2015, 07:36:59 PM
 #2

A Solution to Bitcoin's Governance Problem

http://techcrunch.com/2015/09/21/a-solution-to-bitcoins-governance-problem/

All the developers agree that the strategy of forking the main software is less than ideal, but where they disagree is that both sets of developers feel that they are acting in the best interests of Bitcoin users. As a result, the solution to this disagreement lies in the same principles that govern corporations, a vote by stakeholders weighted by their respective stakes.

I'm curious what the people from the world's biggest democracy think about the aforementioned proposal?

The big difference I see is that rather than each person getting one vote, voting is based on how much you actually own.

Fucking consensus and democratic. They said!

He's Nick Sazbo from Washington. I've my answer. Or Hal? :O
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!