This is a more secure alternative, right? Because with SecurePrint, if an attacker has the SecurePrint paper backup but not the SecurePrint code, he can still try to brute-force it. On the other hand, with the 2/2 fragmented backup, if the attacker gets only one of them, he can't even do anything. There's nothing he can brute force. Am I right? Or is there actually something he can brute force but it's just way more expensive than the SecurePrint brute force?
Look up on Shamir Secret Sharing to understand the security behind fragmented backups. If you use SecurePrint fragmented backups, then the attacker really has nothing. Keep in mind the SecurePrint passphrase is unique per wallet, i.e. there's only one SP passphrase for any N fragments.