They're beginning to out themselves:
Can these people really claim to want money that's "independent from government influence", as Jeff Berwick puts it, when the change to Bitcoin is being promoted by investment from (or association with former stellar employees) of Goldman Sachs/Wal-Mart/Accel/Santander/PayPal etc?
Can they really claim to be credible libertarians, seeking to promote a suppressed idea, when they themselves only promote one side of the debate?
It's not too late to save face and actually give a platform to these "smart guys" whose opposing opinion they claim to have respect for.