Lack of discretion in the p2pool nodes lead to big losses

[tubexc]

  Node scanner sites like p2pool.co that place maximum score to nodes like elizium that produce invalid shares should review their work and not to go deceive people.

 Elizium.name:9332 is a p2pool node that is outdated ( p2pool v15 and not v16 ) and that leads people to lose time and money because as posted on reddit https://m.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMining/comments/4r928y/extremely_long_expected_time_to_block_with_p2pool/?utm_source=mweb_redirect&compact=true its shares are invalid.



 I think this type of nodes should be closed !!!    

[mahrens917]

Thanks for the update.  I have updated http://p2pool.co to give a score of zero for those running version 15.  It is usually as simple as emailing the owner of such sites to let them know of an issue.  With that said, has anyone reached out to elizium.name or cammello.agaland.it?

[kano]

Thanks for the update.  I have updated http://p2pool.co to give a score of zero for those running version 15.  It is usually as simple as emailing the owner of such sites to let them know of an issue.  With that said, has anyone reached out to elizium.name or cammello.agaland.it?

Ah, I guess what you mean by that is that the web sites are legacy, no one running them pays attention to the data they produce, and someone needs to inform the owners that their site is out of date and ignoring what has recently happened with p2pool?

[tubexc]

 

GitHub said he would investigate the account.

 But so far no one compensated me for damages ! 

[squidicuz]

GitHub said he would investigate the account.

 But so far no one compensated me for damages ! 

There hasn't been a block found by the pool anyway...  As long as you are running fine now, you are good to go and hopefully a block is found soon.

Meanwhile, that node is still outdated and with 20TH :/

[tubexc]

Expected time to block 9 days!
It's not soon and with this block halving thing
it's getting a lot worst to mine and take any profit from it