Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 03:00:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Could the market cap be intentionally raised by a single party?  (Read 2218 times)
Piper67
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 07, 2013, 07:57:41 PM
 #21

BTC doesn't lose it's value if you spend it for something, even if at some later point in the chain it converts back to fiat, because if there's something out there that you can spend BTC on, that BCT will be re-purchased to be used for that purpose. It's a funny little concept called money.
Actually, this is all a "funny little concept" called trading. It's irrelevant whether you spend the bitcoins on fiat currency or goods. You will be flooding the market with BTC, and that will push the value down. It won't be easier to find someone who will trade for the full value in goods than in fiat, so instead of getting less fiat you will get less goods. It would have exactly the same effect as printing fiat and spending them on goods.

Or so it would be, if the system was static and we didn't know about the velocity of money concept.
Grinder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1284
Merit: 1001


View Profile
February 07, 2013, 08:15:04 PM
 #22

Or so it would be, if the system was static and we didn't know about the velocity of money concept.
Fantastic! Then here's how to get infinite wealth. 1. Buy tons of bitcoins, pushing the price and thus the value of the coins up. 2. Trade them for something you can sell for fiat. 3. Sell the goods for fiat. 4. Go to 1.
Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
February 10, 2013, 12:55:45 PM
 #23

it would work perfectly well so long as you were willing to spend years in order to effectively liquidate your position.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
Luno
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 10, 2013, 02:53:49 PM
 #24

It is, you know!

The market has been nursed since 4.50-5 to get confidence back. If nobody had taken over the market, we would have been messing around $7-15 still.

While the concept might seem scary, all markets have this kind of giant operators behind them with vision and cash to catch the tumbling baby and we are greatfull that they are there and willing to take on such an enormous risk. Everybody here has earned some money because of them.
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
February 10, 2013, 06:56:12 PM
 #25

It is, you know!

The market has been nursed since 4.50-5 to get confidence back. If nobody had taken over the market, we would have been messing around $7-15 still.

While the concept might seem scary, all markets have this kind of giant operators behind them with vision and cash to catch the tumbling baby and we are greatfull that they are there and willing to take on such an enormous risk. Everybody here has earned some moneypaper profits because of them.

FTFY

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!