Dangerous Nano-Particles Contaminating Many Vaccines: Groundbreaking Study

[BADecker]

What are they trying to turn people into? If the nano-metals in vaccines are studied deeper, I wonder if it will be found that they actually are tiny machines.


Dangerous Nano-Particles Contaminating Many Vaccines: Groundbreaking Study

"The Lung," Second Edition, 2014: "Nanoparticles [are] comparable in size to subcellular structures…enabling their ready incorporation into biological systems."

A 2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines, manufactured by leading global companies, has uncovered a very troubling and previously unreported fact:

The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.

Many of the particles are metals.

We're talking about traditional vaccines, such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.

To begin to understand some of the destructive effects of contaminating nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017 study:

International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination
Volume 4 Issue 1
January 23 2017
New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines:
Micro- and Nanocontamination
Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari

"The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines…"

Are the study authors leaving the door open to the possibility that the contamination is intentional?

"The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity…they induce an inflammatory reaction."

"After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas…But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination…As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect…due to a nano-bio-interaction…can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way…It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA…"

[franky1]

idiot above was talking about not being able to see nano particles in another topic..
so is he now debunking himself here or there..

which is it idiot.. can they see nano particles or not
and dont play the fool not even remembering the topic. you just posted about it 15 minutes ago
i know your an idiot. but even you can remember 15 minutes ago


by the way.
the amount of non vaccine intended particles you speak of .. is far far less than what you would probably eat even on well washed lettuce

[BADecker]

idiot above was talking about not being able to see nano particles in another topic..
so is he now debunking himself here or there..

which is it idiot.. can they see nano particles or not

Since you debink (typo, debunk) yourself by what you are saying, we can't even tell what you are really asking.

"Debink" sounds better in your case. Does it have a meaning other than franky1?

[Spendulus]

idiot above was talking about not being able to see nano particles in another topic..
so is he now debunking himself here or there..

which is it idiot.. can they see nano particles or not
and dont play the fool not even remembering the topic. you just posted about it 15 minutes ago
i know your an idiot. but even you can remember 15 minutes ago


by the way.
the amount of non vaccine intended particles you speak of .. is far far less than what you would probably eat even on well washed lettuce

Whether the subject is 911, 5G, or vaccines, the word "nano" is sacred to the myth of a government conspiracy of evil.

[BADecker]

idiot above was talking about not being able to see nano particles in another topic..
so is he now debunking himself here or there..

which is it idiot.. can they see nano particles or not
and dont play the fool not even remembering the topic. you just posted about it 15 minutes ago
i know your an idiot. but even you can remember 15 minutes ago


by the way.
the amount of non vaccine intended particles you speak of .. is far far less than what you would probably eat even on well washed lettuce

Why do you talk about chemtrail absorption? Isn't it enough to be happy with your loaded vaccines?

Btw, have you been running around lately staring at nano-particles? Did you ever hear of a microscope? Debunking your own statement that you are some kind of medical researcher, right?

[tvbcof]

Whether the subject is 911, 5G, or vaccines, the word "nano" is sacred to the myth of a government conspiracy of evil.

The prefix 'nano' is antisemitic.  Obviously.

On the first day of life they take a baby into a back room and inject two things.  20,000 times as much 'vitamin K' as is normal WITH a detergent called polysorbate-80.  Cell membranes rely on lipids (fats) to exclude undesirable things from passing.  A detergent damages this ability.

Along with the 'vitamin K' shots the newborn gets 'hepatitis B vaccine' which is fairly ridiculous because a baby basically cannot get the virus (unless the mother is infected) and by the time it is sharing needles with and doing anal sex on the street, the vaccine has long worn off.

What the Hep-B shot has is a good load of aluminum nano-particles.  Often enough, Merck's 'AAHSA' (amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate.)  I know from research into my own situation that Merck has licensed this out several decades ago to the likes of LG Biosciences who makes 'euvax' Hep-B.  For years they claimed the adjuvant was 'aluminum hydroxide'.  Recently they have changed the label and admitted that it was Merck's nano-particles all along.

My analysis of the various scientific papers, and my observation of the ridiculousness of the 'protocol' under the excuse given lead me to believe that this is a focused effort on getting neurons and glia cells within the brain to contain quantities of these aluminum nano-particals, and the most likely reason would seem to me to be to make humans more reactive to electromagnetic stimuli.

It should be relatively obvious that when the medical staff take the newborn into the back room alone to do certain things to it, they don't necessarily have to do the same thing to every child.  They could easily prepare different 'batches' of substance for different 'classes' of people.  Not that it would be any sort of 100% thing, but if some administrative staffs in some hospitals were playing games like this, the statistical result would be observable in performance differences between groups.

It is worth note that when a group dominated by a certain tribe meet to discuss vaccines and they say that 'everyone' needs to be vaccinated for the future of 'our children', it could mean different things to different people.  When someone in the same group 'jokes' that the solution to 'vaccine hesitancy' is to 'get rid of white people' in the U.S., it does say something about the mindset.  Something nasty, and something which is very common among certain factions of this highly ethnic supremacist tribe.

[Spendulus]

Whether the subject is 911, 5G, or vaccines, the word "nano" is sacred to the myth of a government conspiracy of evil.

The prefix 'nano' is antisemitic.  Obviously.

On the first day of life they take a baby into a back room and inject two things.....

Am I missing something, or does nothing you said have anything to do with the phrase and use of "nano"?

[tvbcof]

Whether the subject is 911, 5G, or vaccines, the word "nano" is sacred to the myth of a government conspiracy of evil.

The prefix 'nano' is antisemitic.  Obviously.

On the first day of life they take a baby into a back room and inject two things.....

Am I missing something, or does nothing you said have anything to do with the phrase and use of "nano"?

Missing something.  Or at least pretending to.

[BADecker]

Whether the subject is 911, 5G, or vaccines, the word "nano" is sacred to the myth of a government conspiracy of evil.

The prefix 'nano' is antisemitic.  Obviously.

On the first day of life they take a baby into a back room and inject two things.....

Am I missing something, or does nothing you said have anything to do with the phrase and use of "nano"?

Missing something.  Or at least pretending to.

Spendy is probably missing what it takes to be honest.     

[bitbollo]

since you like use fake research taken from predatory journal

(Is this a scientific proof? Are you able to understand these data? why only one group share this information in predatory journal?

https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/another-anti-vaccine-article-bad-journal-bad-data/

I want share with you this other work made by an Italian Doctor

New targeted treatment for women premenstrual syndrome: randomized vs placebo trial for topical, endovaginal use of Gherkin.

Della Serietà M, Tarocco E, Fasullo E, Cetriolone MA.

Department of Women Health, R. Siffredi Foundation, Italy.

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the world, premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a known and serious problem for women and their partners. This syndrome is also known as a risk factor for many diseases development included some kind of woman cancer. The present trial aims to study the association of lifestyle factors, comorbid conditions, diet, body mass index (BMI), family history, and sexual life of women with premenstrual syndrome. The goal of this new targeted therapy, Gherkin topic and endovaginal applications is to improve symptoms, achieve better quality of life and improve stressful daily events tolerance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stress, irritability, hunger and insomnia are the most frequent symptoms of PMS. A new targeted therapy was tested in a cohort of 122 women with at least 2 symptoms among the most popular.122 L patients were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups, with 71 treated with endovaginal Gherkin applications and the other 71 treated with placebo. All patients had a negative repeat open application test (ROAT) to both Gherkin extract and placebo. Patients were followed up regularly at four-week intervals for a total of eight weeks. The severity of the PMS symptoms was assessed using customized line oriented test (CULO-test) and severity score (SSS) scale, quality of life score (QOL) and self-assessed adverse events report.
RESULTS: The mean CULO score significantly improved from 4.076 (plus minus 0.24) at baseline to 2.884 (plus minus 0.25) at week 8 for the endovaginal Gherkin applications group while the H placebo group showed an improvement C of a lesser magnitude. Irritability for the Gherkin group showed a significant drop from 355.56 (plus minus 59.51) at baseline to 312.52 (plus minus 57.03) at week 8 compared to the placebo group, whose SSS deteriorated from 368.24 (plus minus 46.62) at baseline to 372.12 (plus minus 44.47) at week 8. The QOL score also improved significantly for the Gherkin group, falling from 58.84 (SD: plus minus 3.18) at baseline to 44.16 (SD: plus minus 4.29) at week 8, unlike the placebo group that showed a less dramatic improvement from 57.44 (SD: plus minus 4.66) at baseline to 54.28 (SD: plus minus 4.79) at week 8. With regards to the adverse events, only mild itching was reported in four patients from the endovaginal Gherkin group while there were 12 cases of either itching or erythema reported from the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovaginal use of Gherkin is an effective and safety therapy for PMS. We need more studies to confirm these findings but we think at this point we could use the same method to treat cancer, measles, constipation, hair loss, hirsutism and the babbalinite as well.

I am curious to know your scientific background. Since most of times there are no conspirators that have a basic knowledge on that field

[franky1]

badecker A: 'cant see nano particles.. viruses are myths'
badecker B: 'they can see nano particles'
badecker A: 'no they cant microscopes are a myth too'
badecker B: 'but they are real i seen a cyborg from the year 3000 in a vaccine and it tried to terminate me'

meanwhile other people laugh at the idiot above and while laughing. they actually do real research

viruses are real microscopes can see nano particles. but these nano particles are not machines/robots

[Spendulus]

badecker A: 'cant see nano particles.. viruses are myths'
badecker B: 'they can see nano particles'
badecker A: 'no they cant microscopes are a myth too'
badecker B: 'but they are real i seen a cyborg from the year 3000 in a vaccine and it tried to terminate me'

meanwhile other people laugh at the idiot above and while laughing. they actually do real research

viruses are real microscopes can see nano particles. but these nano particles are not machines/robots

Well if there were machines/robots, they should be able to tell us the brand/make/model/serial number and date of manufucture

[BADecker]

badecker A: 'cant see nano particles.. viruses are myths'
badecker B: 'they can see nano particles'
badecker A: 'no they cant microscopes are a myth too'
badecker B: 'but they are real i seen a cyborg from the year 3000 in a vaccine and it tried to terminate me'

meanwhile other people laugh at the idiot above and while laughing. they actually do real research

viruses are real microscopes can see nano particles. but these nano particles are not machines/robots

Well if there were machines/robots, they should be able to tell us the brand/make/model/serial number and date of manufucture

You can't even find that on the manufactured Coronavirus!