Why do I see feedback as trusted even though user isn't on trust list

[monbux]

I just changed to DT3 to check something, and I see some users have (0) beside their name... yet they are still on that trust level, and I see their trust as "trusted"?
An example would be user Hesaplar.

Thanks!

[Lutpin]

I just changed to DT3 to check something, and I see some users have (0) beside their name... yet they are still on that trust level, and I see their trust as "trusted"?
An example would be user Hesaplar.

Hesaplar is excluded from Blazrs (DT2) trustlist, but included in the one from EAL (DT2 aswell).
This makes their weight on DT3 (0), which however still means that their feedbacks are considered as trusted.
To not see them, another exclude from dt2 or higher would be needed.


tl;dr: (0) means one include and one exclude, while (1) is an include only.

[monbux]

I just changed to DT3 to check something, and I see some users have (0) beside their name... yet they are still on that trust level, and I see their trust as "trusted"?
An example would be user Hesaplar.

Hesaplar is excluded from Blazrs (DT2) trustlist, but included in the one from EAL (DT2 aswell).
This makes their weight on DT3 (0), which however still means that their feedbacks are considered as trusted.
To not see them, another exclude from dt2 or higher would be needed.


tl;dr: (0) means one include and one exclude, while (1) is an include only.

hm, thanks, that makes more since although I didn't see him on EAL's trust list... probably missed it!

[shorena]

I just changed to DT3 to check something, and I see some users have (0) beside their name... yet they are still on that trust level, and I see their trust as "trusted"?
An example would be user Hesaplar.

Hesaplar is excluded from Blazrs (DT2) trustlist, but included in the one from EAL (DT2 aswell).
This makes their weight on DT3 (0), which however still means that their feedbacks are considered as trusted.
To not see them, another exclude from dt2 or higher would be needed.


tl;dr: (0) means one include and one exclude, while (1) is an include only.

hm, thanks, that makes more since although I didn't see him on EAL's trust list... probably missed it!

Well, I missed the point why you posted entirely obviously. Anyway, there is a trust.txt updated weekly on sundays[1]. It makes it easier to search for connections even though it might be lagging behind a bit.

Code:

$ cat trust.txt | grep Hesaplar
Blazr-/>Hesaplar
EAL->Hesaplar
srknbyr-/>Hesaplar
designerusa->Hesaplar
olcaytu2005-/>Hesaplar
n3o111->Hesaplar
Hesaplar->theymos
Hesaplar->dserrano5
Hesaplar->-ck
Hesaplar->BadBear
Hesaplar->Cyrus
Hesaplar-/>Stunna
Hesaplar-/>master-P
Hesaplar->Operatr
Hesaplar->EAL
Hesaplar-/>xsentus
Hesaplar->Tstar
Hesaplar->cakir
Hesaplar->mitzie
Hesaplar-/>jonald_fyookball
Hesaplar->CoinKolik
Hesaplar-/>The Pharmacist
Hesaplar->ridewithme
Hesaplar->salinizm
sanandreas->Hesaplar
satmas-/>Hesaplar

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/trust.txt.xz