Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 09:57:52 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Calculating CPU need for GPU and by-question about underclocking  (Read 1616 times)
BluesBrother (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0



View Profile
April 06, 2013, 10:23:05 PM
Last edit: April 06, 2013, 10:57:26 PM by BluesBrother
 #1

Hey all!

Been reading up on these two:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU

The simple answer is: You don't. You set affinity and run things per core.
But is it possible to calculate this?

The thoughtprocess behind the idea is a server setup of multiprocess, multicore motherboards hooked up to things like Tesla GPUs, giving enough cores for the GPUs (hopefully more than one core per GPU) and then mining with the rest.


Also curious about why some people underclock and underpower their GPUs?

Thanks.
middlemarkal
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 181
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 07, 2013, 01:08:26 AM
 #2

Hey all!

Been reading up on these two:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Why_a_GPU_mines_faster_than_a_CPU

The simple answer is: You don't. You set affinity and run things per core.for sha256 mining you don't need CPU power
But is it possible to calculate this?

The thoughtprocess behind the idea is a server setup of multiprocess, multicore motherboards hooked up to things like Tesla GPUs, giving enough cores for the GPUs (hopefully more than one core per GPU) and then mining with the rest.


Also curious about why some people underclock and underpower their GPUs? .for sha256 mining you don't need GPU RAM so you reduce it to minimum, also running colder is bettre for life of gpu card so we undervolt as much as possible at standart speed so that our cards last.

Thanks.

DISCIPLINA — The First Blockchain For HR & Education
From core developers of Cardano, PoS minting, unique Web Of Trust & Privacy algorithms. Be the first, join us!
  WEBSITE  TELEGRAM  ANN  BOUNTY  LINKEDIN  WHITEPAPER  Referral Program 5%
BluesBrother (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0



View Profile
April 07, 2013, 03:46:55 AM
 #3

Ah I see.
I thought you needed (very little?) CPU power but I read several threads telling people to attach entire cores for the GPU instead of just setting prioity for example. Are they then incorrect in thei assesment?

Quick google:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=69445.0
A Meteorite
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
April 07, 2013, 03:51:56 AM
 #4

Ah I see.
I thought you needed (very little?) CPU power but I read several threads telling people to attach entire cores for the GPU instead of just setting prioity for example. Are they then incorrect in thei assesment?

Quick google:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=69445.0
It seems that thread is someone experiencing slowdowns in GPU mining by CPU mining, so they have to set affinity for an unused CPU for the GPU miners.

You really shouldn't CPU mine. You will incur a net loss. Even if your power is free, it still doesn't really make sense (not worth the toll on the hardware).

If you're only GPU mining, CPU doesn't really matter (just get the cheapest/lowest power). My mining rig is 4x Radeon 5850s (1.4 GH/s total) on a Sempron 140. It doesn't impact the mining whatsoever. As far as underclocking the GPUs, people do it because it lowers power usage (thereby decreasing heat and increasing life). If you underclock the memory, it makes practically no difference when mining SHA256 chains. The only time memory matters is for scrypt chains (like Litecoin).

I also see your first post talks about Tesla GPUs... mining on Nvidia is pretty much worthless, so I hope you're not buying Tesla cards just to mine on them.

BTC: 1MeTeorfxZNsY6gJDBtrF8JA8KEv6SKGUmLTC: Lejxgou6hUkjupF6RoruxJGG9AQ7t3ovYt
BluesBrother (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0



View Profile
April 07, 2013, 01:43:02 PM
 #5

Yeah you're right of course, was just a theoretical setup.
Although high end Teslas that I can''t afford could be good Smiley

Hoped that maybe someone knew a tool to easily test a potential bottleneck for GPUs without experimenting to much.
Could be used for gaming to and other stuff.


I'm reading up that it might have some value for litecoin mining though together with Nvidias system being a bit more suited aswell.
Some of the self-clocking intelchips seem to have a little effect. They would yeild you about 70 dollars a year at the current state.


Do you know any comparison-chart for litecoins?
crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 07, 2013, 05:40:55 PM
 #6

There used to be bugs where running a OCL application (like Bitcoin mining) would use up 100% CPU on one core. If you had more GPUs than you had CPU cores, this could be a problem.

Those issues have since been fixed, and you can get drivers/SDKs that do not ramp your CPU up to 100%. Since this, CPU speed is completely irrelevant. That wiki link has not been updated in a very long time.

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
BluesBrother (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0



View Profile
April 10, 2013, 12:42:15 AM
 #7

Cheers
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!