Topic

[coolcoinz]

Stalin was given parts of EU yes. Soviets did after all do quite a bit to win the war. Their losses were the most of any country I think they deserved Ukraine and parts of the EU. What they did with it after was horrible. Stalin was worse than Hitler in that case.

If The Soviets didn't get anything they would have been butthurt and started more conflicts to take what they thought they deserved. Making a deal with them at the time was the best possible choice for peace.

What a pile of steaming crap. They also did quite a bit to start the war. Didn't they invade Poland along with the Germans? When they were the invaders it was all good, but when their allies, the Nazis, turned against them they suddenly became the martyrs and the saviors of Europe
They deserved Ukraine? I don't know where you are from, but If your country was now attacked by one neighbor and liberated with the help of another you wouldn't just give them everything and become a part of their country to show appreciation.
And it's important to say Europe wasn't liberated by the Russians, but with their help. Do you think people of every occupied country just stood and watched?

[Sithara007]

What a pile of steaming crap. They also did quite a bit to start the war. Didn't they invade Poland along with the Germans? When they were the invaders it was all good, but when their allies, the Nazis, turned against them they suddenly became the martyrs and the saviors of Europe
They deserved Ukraine? I don't know where you are from, but If your country was now attacked by one neighbor and liberated with the help of another you wouldn't just give them everything and become a part of their country to show appreciation.
And it's important to say Europe wasn't liberated by the Russians, but with their help. Do you think people of every occupied country just stood and watched?

That can be said about the Americans as well. They refused to participate in the war, until it became clear that the Axis powers are about to lose. So in 1945 they began their participation, in order to receive their share of the war loot.

[BADecker]

What a pile of steaming crap. They also did quite a bit to start the war. Didn't they invade Poland along with the Germans? When they were the invaders it was all good, but when their allies, the Nazis, turned against them they suddenly became the martyrs and the saviors of Europe
They deserved Ukraine? I don't know where you are from, but If your country was now attacked by one neighbor and liberated with the help of another you wouldn't just give them everything and become a part of their country to show appreciation.
And it's important to say Europe wasn't liberated by the Russians, but with their help. Do you think people of every occupied country just stood and watched?

That can be said about the Americans as well. They refused to participate in the war, until it became clear that the Axis powers are about to lose. So in 1945 they began their participation, in order to receive their share of the war loot.

It was done by Government that way, so that while the American men were gone, government could change itself into a corrupt civil government, without anybody to stop them. They can still be stopped, but the way is more difficult.

[ivanpoldark]

The only thing that Western World makes, that can be named "coward actions" is bombing Pakistan and Afghanistan using the drones with remoted control. But if the aim is terrorist, may be it is rightly.

[valta4065]

For all the talk of bravery, people of the u.s. are some of the biggest most pathetic cowards.  Actions speak louder than words.

What actions are you talking about? You mean like when they saved the world from tyranny in 1945?

Who saved who in 1945? please tell, thanks.

USSR I'd say 

But I don't really see the point in accusing USA of cowardice. They're engaged in the most conflicts in the world. They're dumb, expansionist, arrogant and a plague to this world, but they're not cowards!

[marilyngroom]

You can't put every member of a country into one group.

[Sithara007]

But I don't really see the point in accusing USA of cowardice. They're engaged in the most conflicts in the world. They're dumb, expansionist, arrogant and a plague to this world, but they're not cowards!

The United States is a country being run by the big corporations. They engage in so many wars, so that the corporations (especially those in the oil and gas, defense, and banking sectors) can profit out of it.

[canah17]

For all the talk of bravery, people of the u.s. are some of the biggest most pathetic cowards.  Actions speak louder than words. Stupid.

Wow! You're strong i like it but really united states is not really that pathetic and cowardly they help so many people in other countries they fight for their nation and they even die for their nation so why? call them pathetic? i want to know so that i would believe you and support you with that and i think of it that trump is now president of the U.S well its a little bit cowardly i don't really believe trump is a strong leader or president unlike putin in russia but still i can't judge them really and trump's power is money so money can't really but happiness and money can't really make you rule the world or make you stronger so today U.S is not really that pathetic but trump i don't think his fit to be a president and i think his a coward >.< i will judge but i didn't mean it just an opinion

[E-shipper]

What a pile of steaming crap. They also did quite a bit to start the war. Didn't they invade Poland along with the Germans? When they were the invaders it was all good, but when their allies, the Nazis, turned against them they suddenly became the martyrs and the saviors of Europe
They deserved Ukraine? I don't know where you are from, but If your country was now attacked by one neighbor and liberated with the help of another you wouldn't just give them everything and become a part of their country to show appreciation.
And it's important to say Europe wasn't liberated by the Russians, but with their help. Do you think people of every occupied country just stood and watched?

That can be said about the Americans as well. They refused to participate in the war, until it became clear that the Axis powers are about to lose. So in 1945 they began their participation, in order to receive their share of the war loot.

Immediately obvious that you were brought up in the false Russian propaganda. If you mean the opening of a second front, it was in 1944, not in 1945. Just before that, the Americans kept Japan from attacking Russia. And that Russia did without lend lease?