5 bitcoin transactions stuck, urgently need, anything can be done?

[tennis]

Hello, I have this situation and I'm not sure I understand what to do.  I need these transactions pushed because I need to regain access to the btc for personal purposes.

https://blockchain.info/address/1BZRFsmoT9xsAZYgmXhbRWFc9tLLG5t6co
This is the address I sent to from LocalBitcoins the .225 transaction.  I then proceeded to make 5 bitcoin sends with auto fees from my blockchain browser wallet, all of which are delayed for over 12 hours now.

https://blockchain.info/tx/06c7db81c3b6b2f41014b7ad3ba56f6b5ccf8cae9634f0cba656ffddde3a6031
https://blockchain.info/tx/b74e6489fd86088a9efa07d99572d27e43989204ec9f4d6f1f458d606825d4c1
https://blockchain.info/tx/c443b87c82a398a1ac98355278e76d6b542cb4a67c7f7db962d3720955d0935d
https://blockchain.info/tx/bf82c5382eed772c91f92bea966d46645f84a2c5ec0d50536a379bb6c8c8389d
https://blockchain.info/tx/cfe5d2168182b20cedddc562bb2e10b767c414ec34c02388ad0c445490d5b95a

How do I go about getting these pushed?  When I try and use the pushtx function it says the transaction already exists in blockchain.

How do I rebroadcast this and get it picked up by a block asap?  I used auto fees but after this i'll use higher fees with every send.

[longbob72]

Read this and the replies below that. Pretty much the same as your problem down to the fee (and wallet).

[unholycactus]

Your first transaction didn't confirm.
You then proceeded to use those funds for the next 5.

Because you are using unconfirmed funds, your subsequent 5 transactions won't be able to be confirmed until the first one does.
It seems like the change on your first transaction (https://blockchain.info/tx/06c7db81c3b6b2f41014b7ad3ba56f6b5ccf8cae9634f0cba656ffddde3a6031) is the one holding up everything.

To avoid the problem next time, make sure fees are setup properly in LocalBitcoins.

[tennis]

OK yes, because I'm using a blockchain wallet.

I just entered all of the tx id's into https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/

I also PM'd a couple people who could help get a confirm for a bounty.  How do I get a miner to include this in a block asap?  Willing to pay for it. 

I will look into getting LocalBitcoins to work but the initial deposit has already confirmed 100+ times that went from LocalBTC to my Blockchain browser wallet.  So I don't understand how this happened.

[longbob72]

OK yes, because I'm using a blockchain wallet.

I just entered all of the tx id's into https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/

I also PM'd a couple people who could help get a confirm for a bounty.  How do I get a miner to include this in a block asap?  Willing to pay for it.  

I will look into getting LocalBitcoins to work but the initial deposit has already confirmed 100+ times that went from LocalBTC to my Blockchain browser wallet.  So I don't understand how this happened.

If you already PM'd those 2 users then you'll just need to wait for their replies. They will add your transaction to F2pool (probably will ask for a small fee).

There's no problem with LocalBitcoins. Just blockchain.info's usual 65 satoshi / byte fee which appears to be their maximum rate (still not sure but happens frequently).

[tennis]

Thank you for being of such great help... appreciate the quick clarification.  It seems the unconfirmed transactions are climbing rapidly too, at 71,000 now.  https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions

[unholycactus]

OK yes, because I'm using a blockchain wallet.

I just entered all of the tx id's into https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/

I also PM'd a couple people who could help get a confirm for a bounty.  How do I get a miner to include this in a block asap?  Willing to pay for it.  

I will look into getting LocalBitcoins to work but the initial deposit has already confirmed 100+ times that went from LocalBTC to my Blockchain browser wallet.  So I don't understand how this happened.

If you already PM'd those 2 users then you'll just need to wait for their replies. They will add your transaction to F2pool (probably will ask for a small fee).

There's no problem with LocalBitcoins. Just blockchain.info's usual 65 satoshi / byte fee which appears to be their maximum rate (still not sure but happens frequently).

My mistake then. I thought the original transaction was taken directly from LocalBitcoins. If it was from the blockchain wallet, you should look into that instead.

[tennis]

My mistake then. I thought the original transaction was taken directly from LocalBitcoins. If it was from the blockchain wallet, you should look into that instead.

OK, so basically I just sent from my blockchain wallet and it did something I haven't seen before... it kept sending the bitcoin from address to address even though i was divvying out the original .225 i had received.

https://blockchain.info/tx/06c7db81c3b6b2f41014b7ad3ba56f6b5ccf8cae9634f0cba656ffddde3a6031
https://blockchain.info/tx/b74e6489fd86088a9efa07d99572d27e43989204ec9f4d6f1f458d606825d4c1
https://blockchain.info/tx/c443b87c82a398a1ac98355278e76d6b542cb4a67c7f7db962d3720955d0935d
https://blockchain.info/tx/bf82c5382eed772c91f92bea966d46645f84a2c5ec0d50536a379bb6c8c8389d
https://blockchain.info/tx/cfe5d2168182b20cedddc562bb2e10b767c414ec34c02388ad0c445490d5b95a


First one is for .027, so is that the one that's holding the rest up?  Will each one in succession have this problem as well or will they all confirm once the first .027 send confirms?

[longbob72]

My mistake then. I thought the original transaction was taken directly from LocalBitcoins. If it was from the blockchain wallet, you should look into that instead.

OK, so basically I just sent from my blockchain wallet and it did something I haven't seen before... it kept sending the bitcoin from address to address even though i was divvying out the original .225 i had received.

https://blockchain.info/tx/06c7db81c3b6b2f41014b7ad3ba56f6b5ccf8cae9634f0cba656ffddde3a6031
https://blockchain.info/tx/b74e6489fd86088a9efa07d99572d27e43989204ec9f4d6f1f458d606825d4c1
https://blockchain.info/tx/c443b87c82a398a1ac98355278e76d6b542cb4a67c7f7db962d3720955d0935d
https://blockchain.info/tx/bf82c5382eed772c91f92bea966d46645f84a2c5ec0d50536a379bb6c8c8389d
https://blockchain.info/tx/cfe5d2168182b20cedddc562bb2e10b767c414ec34c02388ad0c445490d5b95a


First one is for .027, so is that the one that's holding the rest up?  Will each one in succession have this problem as well or will they all confirm once the first .027 send confirms?

Since all of those are using the same fee, tx #2 to #5 might still have to wait after the first one is confirmed.
If you want them all to confirm all at once you'll have to push all of them to the accelerator or ask QS/macbook-air to push all of them.

[tennis]

Since all of those are using the same fee, tx #2 to #5 might still have to wait after the first one is confirmed.
If you want them all to confirm all at once you'll have to push all of them to the accelerator or ask QS/macbook-air to push all of them.

OK great, so I messaged those two guys plus entered them all into the accelerator already.

Is there anyone else to contact or anything else to do or have I done all I can Greatly appreciate your help My worries are much more eased at the moment.

[sotirispngt]

All you can do is just wait.
There are 70k> unconfirmed transactions right now.
So, a lot of people are anxious and angry like you.

[tennis]

Guys it has confirmed !!!  Maybe the accelerator worked!!???  So crazy today )))))))) Yay!!!!!

[achow101]

My mistake then. I thought the original transaction was taken directly from LocalBitcoins. If it was from the blockchain wallet, you should look into that instead.

OK, so basically I just sent from my blockchain wallet and it did something I haven't seen before... it kept sending the bitcoin from address to address even though i was divvying out the original .225 i had received.

That is not how Bitcoin works. It does not divvy up the amounts. Bitcoin works by spending from and creating transaction outputs. Think of these outputs like a bill (as in dollar bill, physical cash). In order to spend some of that bill but not all of it, you need to get change. In Bitcoin, there is also change. This change is in all of your transactions where you are not spending the entire output amount. When you need to spend again, you are not spending from the original output but rather the change output. Your wallet is spending from that change, which is what is causing the chain of transactions.

https://blockchain.info/tx/06c7db81c3b6b2f41014b7ad3ba56f6b5ccf8cae9634f0cba656ffddde3a6031
https://blockchain.info/tx/b74e6489fd86088a9efa07d99572d27e43989204ec9f4d6f1f458d606825d4c1
https://blockchain.info/tx/c443b87c82a398a1ac98355278e76d6b542cb4a67c7f7db962d3720955d0935d
https://blockchain.info/tx/bf82c5382eed772c91f92bea966d46645f84a2c5ec0d50536a379bb6c8c8389d
https://blockchain.info/tx/cfe5d2168182b20cedddc562bb2e10b767c414ec34c02388ad0c445490d5b95a


First one is for .027, so is that the one that's holding the rest up?  Will each one in succession have this problem as well or will they all confirm once the first .027 send confirms?

Probably. They all have the same fairly low fee so not all of them will confirm at the same time.

Edit: Some but not all of your transactions have confirmed.

[longbob72]

https://blockchain.info/tx/06c7db81c3b6b2f41014b7ad3ba56f6b5ccf8cae9634f0cba656ffddde3a6031
https://blockchain.info/tx/b74e6489fd86088a9efa07d99572d27e43989204ec9f4d6f1f458d606825d4c1
https://blockchain.info/tx/c443b87c82a398a1ac98355278e76d6b542cb4a67c7f7db962d3720955d0935d
https://blockchain.info/tx/bf82c5382eed772c91f92bea966d46645f84a2c5ec0d50536a379bb6c8c8389d
https://blockchain.info/tx/cfe5d2168182b20cedddc562bb2e10b767c414ec34c02388ad0c445490d5b95a


First one is for .027, so is that the one that's holding the rest up?  Will each one in succession have this problem as well or will they all confirm once the first .027 send confirms?

Probably. They all have the same fairly low fee so not all of them will confirm at the same time.

Edit: Some but not all of your transactions have confirmed.

Actually all of them already confirmed in block 449830 mined by ViaBTC.

Some block explorers' connected nodes are out of sync, looks like.

Maybe the accelerator worked!!???

They were mined by ViaBTC, so yeah.