when setting servers , what does this "limits" mean

[bitcoinreports]

When setting servers , what does this "Limits" mean?

http://image.prntscr.com/image/e33ed18fcd3b4a34bfa5d3a4ecb8246e.png

Thanks a lot.

[OmegaStarScream]

That should be the number of addresses you could have while being connected to that server as far as I know, because servers have the ability to know what address belong to you (to your wallet).

[bitcoinreports]

That should be the number of addresses you could have while being connected to that server as far as I know, because servers have the ability to know what address belong to you (to your wallet).

I have a trans with low fee and takes long time and still 0 confirmations now


I want to find some " Replace-By-Fee"  full node .  Do you know anyone?

OR. some full node(servers) that only accept high fee trans.( So that they don't have my old trans in his memory pool, I can start the new)

[ranochigo]

I have a trans with low fee and takes long time and still 0 confirmations now


I want to find some " Replace-By-Fee"  full node .  Do you know anyone?

I believe you are looking for a miner that would accept an alternate transaction. Nodes can't guarantee that everyone would agree with your transaction that has a conflicting transaction in the mempool.

However, if you have opt-in RBF enabled, you can easily create another transaction that replaces the initial transaction. I believe that you don't have though. Do share your transaction and I can help you to look into it.

OR. some full node(servers) that only accept high fee trans.( So that they don't have my old trans in his memory pool, I can start the new)

As said, a single node accepting your transaction will not mean that the entire network would accept and relay your transaction. If a node don't have your transaction in their mempool, another node could have it and that node will not relay your transaction. Unless a miner don't have your transaction in their mempool, this won't work.

[kolloh]

When setting servers , what does this "Limits" mean?

http://image.prntscr.com/image/e33ed18fcd3b4a34bfa5d3a4ecb8246e.png

Thanks a lot.

This limit controls how many spent transactions per address are stored on the server. The default is 100, but there are also servers with 1000 or even 10000. Few addresses have more than 10000 transactions. A limit this high can be considered equivalent to a "full" server.

[pooya87]

That should be the number of addresses you could have while being connected to that server as far as I know, because servers have the ability to know what address belong to you (to your wallet).

I have a trans with low fee and takes long time and still 0 confirmations now
I want to find some " Replace-By-Fee"  full node .  Do you know anyone?
OR. some full node(servers) that only accept high fee trans.( So that they don't have my old trans in his memory pool, I can start the new)

just to add to what ranochigo said:
in order to make an opt-in RBF transaction, your initial transaction must have been an RBF transaction. you can't do that with normal transactions.
for that you needed to enable it in the preference window and then you needed to check it to be replaceable.

to make sure you can open your transaction in a block explorer and if you saw the "sequence"s be anything other than "4294967295" (or ffffffff) for example feffffff (or 4294967038) your transaction is an RBF transaction

[bitcoinreports]

That should be the number of addresses you could have while being connected to that server as far as I know, because servers have the ability to know what address belong to you (to your wallet).

I have a trans with low fee and takes long time and still 0 confirmations now
I want to find some " Replace-By-Fee"  full node .  Do you know anyone?
OR. some full node(servers) that only accept high fee trans.( So that they don't have my old trans in his memory pool, I can start the new)

just to add to what ranochigo said:
in order to make an opt-in RBF transaction, your initial transaction must have been an RBF transaction. you can't do that with normal transactions.
for that you needed to enable it in the preference window and then you needed to check it to be replaceable.

to make sure you can open your transaction in a block explorer and if you saw the "sequence"s be anything other than "4294967295" (or ffffffff) for example feffffff (or 4294967038) your transaction is an RBF transaction

I mean full replace not Opt-replace.

I learned that I can do it in electrum  by choosing some kind of node.

[ranochigo]

That should be the number of addresses you could have while being connected to that server as far as I know, because servers have the ability to know what address belong to you (to your wallet).

I have a trans with low fee and takes long time and still 0 confirmations now
I want to find some " Replace-By-Fee"  full node .  Do you know anyone?
OR. some full node(servers) that only accept high fee trans.( So that they don't have my old trans in his memory pool, I can start the new)

just to add to what ranochigo said:
in order to make an opt-in RBF transaction, your initial transaction must have been an RBF transaction. you can't do that with normal transactions.
for that you needed to enable it in the preference window and then you needed to check it to be replaceable.

to make sure you can open your transaction in a block explorer and if you saw the "sequence"s be anything other than "4294967295" (or ffffffff) for example feffffff (or 4294967038) your transaction is an RBF transaction

I mean full replace not Opt-replace.

I learned that I can do it in electrum  by choosing some kind of node.

The replacement transaction will likely not propagate through the network if the opt-in RBF flag is not enabled. The reference client specifically prevents this. Unless you can relay it to a miner who allow RBF, this won't work.

For the Electrum part, I believe you are still referring to opt-in RBF. Electrum does have that option.

[Coding Enthusiast]

Can you explain what is it exactly you are trying to do?
Any transaction you may have had, is either dropped out of mempool already and you can send it out by creating a new transaction or it is confirmed. The mempool was empty for the past 24+ hours and miners are including very low fee transactions.

And if you double spend and try broadcasting the second transaction I believe nodes will reject it if they have the first transaction in their mempool and it is not signalling RBF.