Bitcoin Forum
November 06, 2024, 05:46:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: which one is better, PPS, PPLNS and RBPPS?  (Read 25507 times)
dell00 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 26, 2013, 03:22:22 AM
 #1

hard to decide to go to which pool.    Huh

Anyone can give some insight views?
crazyates
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 26, 2013, 04:07:13 AM
 #2

I don't even know what RBPPS is, lol.

Check out this awesome post HERE that compares all sorts of payout systems.

I'm a big fan of DGM or PPLNS, as PPS can lead to problems with pools. MtRed was strictly PPS, and ended up closing. OzCoin ran into problems where PPS was unprofitable to maintain.

Tips? 1crazy8pMqgwJ7tX7ZPZmyPwFbc6xZKM9
Previous Trade History - Sale Thread
bcpokey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 26, 2013, 04:30:44 AM
 #3

Best for whom and under what situation?
PPS is best for miners, worst for pool owner, guaranteed payout for work, assuming no fee. With fee? Depends how much you're getting eaten into.
PPLNS is pretty good for miners and owners, still can't be hopped, but uses a rolling window to calculate payouts based on found blocks, reducing risk to pool-owner but still paying miners for their found shares.
Round-Based PPS is sort of in between, you get paid per share, but only when blocks are found, reducing operator risk. Seems like the lazy mans way to try to avoid risk/hopping, as it's easier to implement.

Typically for a miner you only care about what you're getting cut into for fees (as long as it's not hoppable).
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098


Think for yourself


View Profile
April 26, 2013, 11:04:11 AM
 #4

hard to decide to go to which pool.    Huh

Anyone can give some insight views?

The previous 2 replies have very good information and are insightful.

I would add that in this mining environment that you want a pool/payout system that is a very low/no risk to the pool.  It is very easy for a pool to go under quickly with PPS.  So I, personally, won't use PPS anymore.

So I would lean toward PPLNS or DGM.
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098


Think for yourself


View Profile
April 26, 2013, 06:33:24 PM
 #5

I've found with PPLNS I often make less...

Make less than what and on what pool?

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098


Think for yourself


View Profile
April 26, 2013, 09:22:00 PM
 #6

I've found with PPLNS I often make less...

Make less than what and on what pool?

I make less than I make with PPS. WeMineLTC (when it was PPLNS) vs. Coinotron.

There are allot variables that come into play with payout systems.  With PPS the variable is the fee, with PPLNS is some other set of figures and the fee is only one of those variables.  Not all PPLNS's or DGM's or even PPS are the same.

What I was trying to say was that I would recommend using a pool whose payout system doesn't cause them to risk bankruptcy.  A 0% PPS pool does nobody any good in the long run if it goes bankrupt and out of business.

Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098


Think for yourself


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 11:44:56 AM
 #7

I've found with PPLNS I often make less...

Make less than what and on what pool?

I make less than I make with PPS. WeMineLTC (when it was PPLNS) vs. Coinotron.

There are allot variables that come into play with payout systems.  With PPS the variable is the fee, with PPLNS is some other set of figures and the fee is only one of those variables.  Not all PPLNS's or DGM's or even PPS are the same.

What I was trying to say was that I would recommend using a pool whose payout system doesn't cause them to risk bankruptcy.  A 0% PPS pool does nobody any good in the long run if it goes bankrupt and out of business.

Sam

I would say a 0% fee PPS pool would do the miners a whole lot of good.

How does a pool that makes no revenue stay in business?

0% PPS pools either goes out of business or they are doing something with your hashrate that nets them a profit which may be something nefarious.
Sam

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098


Think for yourself


View Profile
April 28, 2013, 03:50:47 AM
 #8

I've found with PPLNS I often make less...

Make less than what and on what pool?

I make less than I make with PPS. WeMineLTC (when it was PPLNS) vs. Coinotron.

There are allot variables that come into play with payout systems.  With PPS the variable is the fee, with PPLNS is some other set of figures and the fee is only one of those variables.  Not all PPLNS's or DGM's or even PPS are the same.

What I was trying to say was that I would recommend using a pool whose payout system doesn't cause them to risk bankruptcy.  A 0% PPS pool does nobody any good in the long run if it goes bankrupt and out of business.

Sam

I would say a 0% fee PPS pool would do the miners a whole lot of good.

How does a pool that makes no revenue stay in business?

0% PPS pools either goes out of business or they are doing something with your hashrate that nets them a profit which may be something nefarious.
Sam

The pool doesn't stay in business, it hemorrhages money. The miners make a killing, though.

Which in the end does nobody any good.  Just causes another pool to die and reduces competition.

0 Fee Pools are soon to be a thing of the past so it is a moot point.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
thaile4ever
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 29, 2013, 01:04:51 AM
 #9

In the end it depends on how much time you are mining.

If you are mining a few hours a day on and off then PPS is really the best choice.

With PPLNS and RBPPS the potential payout better, but there are variance in the pay at any given point so you might get lucky one block and not make as much in another.  If you're mining 24/7 though it start to balance out.
phrozenspite
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
May 01, 2013, 06:42:58 AM
 #10

I like the Eligius one. but i haven't had any problems with any of the ones i've tried.  I wish pool operators(specifically in the alt coins) would understand what their reward system was called though, I've seen several claim that their pool was RBPPS when it was just proportional

flound1129
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


www.multipool.us


View Profile
May 07, 2013, 10:34:15 PM
 #11

ARren't PPLNS and RBPPS the same thing?

Multipool - Always mine the most profitable coin - Scrypt, X11 or SHA-256!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!