Bitcoin Forum
November 10, 2024, 11:43:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 5770 efficiency  (Read 961 times)
iNs4nePT (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2012, 08:11:11 PM
 #1

Considering a super-cheap mining rig, i've came across the 5770.

However, the page at https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison seems awkward:

ModelPriceAvg. Mhash/sMhash/J
5770 $136    212.83       1.45 

if the 5770 has a MAX tdp of around 108W, shouldn't that be more like 2.0 MHash/J?

OC'ing 3 of these could get about 700MH/s with around 400W total load: somewhat efficient and cheap Smiley


The reason for the 5770s, is mainly for how easy it is to buy and sell them used, making for a less risky investment than a high-end card...


Comments welcome


conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064


Bitcoin is antisemitic


View Profile
January 30, 2012, 08:35:24 PM
 #2

I think that to get 212 Mhs with a 5770 it must be already well overclocked.
One of my rigs has 2 5750@870/300 hashing at 172 mhs each, running fine 24/7 with an old 500W PSU.
I found them at 50 euros each used (one on ebay included delivery).
iNs4nePT (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2012, 09:45:08 PM
 #3

I think that to get 212 Mhs with a 5770 it must be already well overclocked.

Silly me, you're right. I've looked closely at the charts again, about 180MH/s seems to be the default for these cards.

Still, that would mean 1.8MH/J at stock, much better than 1.45.
electronique
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 03, 2012, 05:57:23 PM
 #4

I have a 5750 (which is 5770 but with insignificant lower speed frequencies) and I'm doing right now 54 Mhash/s. I'm in the BTC Guild, using GUIMiner.


I thought I would have at least 150 Mhash/s... what's the problem?
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064


Bitcoin is antisemitic


View Profile
February 03, 2012, 06:07:09 PM
 #5

I have a 5750 (which is 5770 but with insignificant lower speed frequencies) and I'm doing right now 54 Mhash/s. I'm in the BTC Guild, using GUIMiner.


I thought I would have at least 150 Mhash/s... what's the problem?

S/t is way out of wack. You should get triple speed at stock clock. Are you watching videos or playing all the time? If not, try with Phoenix or reinstall the drivers.
electronique
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 03, 2012, 09:18:15 PM
 #6

Thanks for answering!  Grin

I have updated my drivers and now it's working @ 135 Mhash/s. Also, I have added at extra flags this line: -v -w128
ForceField
aka Vitaliy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 386
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 04, 2012, 06:54:19 PM
 #7

Consider the single-slot 5770. It runs cooler, more efficiently, and has XFX's Lifetime Warranty. See my sig, I have one left if you're interested.

PC Hardware & Electronics For BTC     Traded w/: Kansattica | jduck1987 | shakaru | newdude | nitetrader | midievil | blo8i | mb300sd | juggalodarkclow | Garr255 | Tril | Ringmasta | SysRun | CrazyBlane | sokay | BCB | str4wm4n | PinkBatman | Bitobsessed | matauc12 | antimattercrusader | BryanK
m5750xx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 07, 2013, 09:22:21 AM
 #8

set:

-v -w128 in Extra flags:
christov84
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 07, 2013, 02:00:38 PM
 #9

set:

-v -w128 in Extra flags:
Its scary how much of a difference this makes. I did this on my 6990 and it shot up to around 720mH/s
funnybear
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 96
Merit: 10



View Profile
May 07, 2013, 02:20:27 PM
 #10

mark

Energycoin - Save Energy, Pure POS (Free IPO). e355a9imFx7gbkpra9755mTkJDf5gBRhj2
Let's flower the moon. SfjURGkYyjo8VFxfFPXS89CHhXS2mao3kA
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!