Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 09:16:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2017-08-02] Why a Bitcoin Fork Is Not a 'Stock Split'  (Read 2821 times)
tyz (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3360
Merit: 1531



View Profile
August 02, 2017, 03:50:53 PM
 #1

Why a Bitcoin Fork Is Not a 'Stock Split'

If you've been following the bitcoin fork drama this week, you may have heard the term "stock split" thrown around in interviews with "experts."

Before we get to the problems here, it's true that there are now two publicly traded bitcoin assets, bearing similar names with similar value propositions. They even appear side by side on some major exchanges.

The impulse to use existing terminology as a metaphor to refer to emerging technology is understandable. In fact, it can be incredibly helpful to use existing mental models as a metaphor for things we don't quite have our heads around just yet.

https://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-fork-not-stock-split/
buwaytress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2828
Merit: 3484


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
August 02, 2017, 04:22:10 PM
 #2

It's probably a natural progression for language that has been transferring between crypto and traditional finance. This is especially evident in trading, with a lot of TA analysis barely recognisable from forex. Headlines still use "Bitcoin boss" to describe CEOs of exchanges, and crypto uses "arbitrage" and "assets" more readily.

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
... LIVECASINO.io    Play Live Games with up to 20% cashback!...██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
landslide
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 03, 2017, 12:58:17 AM
 #3

it's more like someone copied the stock certificates and then trade the copies.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!