gordonc (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2011, 12:20:27 AM Last edit: June 16, 2011, 12:42:29 AM by gordonc |
|
|
|
|
|
88bitcoins
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2011, 12:28:28 AM |
|
Hey - this is nice. Used to work for a font foundry years ago. Nice use of type.
|
|
|
|
fascistmuffin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2011, 12:29:46 AM |
|
Looks slick, good job!
|
|
|
|
pointbiz
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 437
Merit: 415
1ninja
|
|
June 16, 2011, 12:38:16 AM |
|
nice!
|
|
|
|
ananas5
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2011, 02:13:35 AM |
|
Looks great, I hope lots of online shops start accepting Bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
EyeRis
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
June 16, 2011, 03:16:45 AM |
|
I believe this exact same post was already made? I could be wrong but I feel you may have copypasta'd this
|
|
|
|
Gdawg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2011, 04:01:59 AM |
|
Looks really nice. I hope we go to this as I don't like the look either.
|
|
|
|
davux
|
|
June 16, 2011, 04:50:17 AM |
|
The design is very nice and looks fairly professional.
However, the striked B is a big no-no to me, because this is already the symbol for Thai Baht.
If anyone thinks it's OK to reuse it because "after all, the $ sign is already used by many currencies", then go ahead and just use the $ sign for Bitcoin. Does it work? Of course it doesn't. So why would the Baht sign?
And yes, although Thailand is far from the United States, it does exist, it's near from many places, and they do have internet there.
People always make jokes about Americans not having any clue about the whole planet living outside the US, so it's time to prove that some/most of you guys are not so narrow-minded.
|
1DavuxH9tLqU4c7zvG387aTG4mA7BcRpp2 México (Oaxaca) – France - Leeds
|
|
|
|
gordonc (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2011, 07:45:36 PM |
|
Hey - this is nice. Used to work for a font foundry years ago. Nice use of type.
Thanks! I love the whole Museo family...
|
|
|
|
dayfall
|
|
June 17, 2011, 08:01:19 PM |
|
I say keep the original double strikes.
|
|
|
|
4n0n
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2011, 08:54:07 PM |
|
See this post I just made.... http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=17757.msg234282#msg234282.... with the crap graphics. That's a free letter that implies BT and can be freely claimed without pissing anyone off. Using that in a logo without the downmarket pawnbroker gold/yellow theme and we're onto a winner IMO. Whatever the end result, a rebranding is necessary. Great, clean graphics work within the obvious limitations btw!
|
|
|
|
gordonc (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2011, 09:01:36 PM |
|
See this post I just made.... http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=17757.msg234282#msg234282.... with the crap graphics. That's a free letter that implies BT and can be freely claimed without pissing anyone off. Using that in a logo without the downmarket pawnbroker gold/yellow theme and we're onto a winner IMO. Whatever the end result, a rebranding is necessary. Great, clean graphics work within the obvious limitations btw! I'm thinking that instead of going for an ASCII symbol the default written form should be 'btC.' Simple, explanatory, no need for weird characters. Planning to execute some identity designs based on 'btC' in the near future.
|
|
|
|
4n0n
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2011, 09:11:55 PM |
|
Yep, I'm with you. Out of the hieroglyph options the lowercase bslash is the best option IMO, but I have to admit that after all these years I write....... $1, £1, 1 EUR. So perhaps the unique hieroglyph should be left alone. Please, please, please forget about the implied-by-previous-logo wild west theme and do a free rebranding - you have the eye for the clean corpo look!
|
|
|
|
bitbonga
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
June 22, 2011, 04:20:11 PM |
|
Smooth!
Which font type did you use? I like it.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinATS.com
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
June 22, 2011, 07:56:02 PM |
|
These are very nice! What license are they being released under?
|
|
|
|
|