MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
June 10, 2013, 09:14:44 PM |
|
On BTC-E: Simplyfun: ZenithCoin, yeah we'll get right on that
What did solracx pay BTC-E for that? Are you suggesting that I pay BTC-E to get listed? Well why not, if it will please investors, miners and users, then why not? You get 50% of the coins, I understand why you are pleased. Read the FAQ at www.zenithcoin.com to get an understanding on why there are a lot of people mining the coin. I read the FAQ the last time. You get 50% and call it "Corporate Equity". I call it "50% premine". That's what it is.
|
|
|
|
solracx (OP)
|
|
June 10, 2013, 09:16:15 PM |
|
On BTC-E: Simplyfun: ZenithCoin, yeah we'll get right on that
What did solracx pay BTC-E for that? Are you suggesting that I pay BTC-E to get listed? Well why not, if it will please investors, miners and users, then why not? You get 50% of the coins, I understand why you are pleased. I just send a message to BTC-E with 3 questions: - are you going to list ZTC? - what did solracx pay you? - how much do I have to pay to get it delisted? Hey, I haven't heard that rumor!!! You telling me BTC-E is going to list ZTC!?
|
ZenithCoin - Sustainable Scrypt Based Crypto Currency
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
June 10, 2013, 09:18:16 PM |
|
On BTC-E: Simplyfun: ZenithCoin, yeah we'll get right on that
What did solracx pay BTC-E for that? Are you suggesting that I pay BTC-E to get listed? Well why not, if it will please investors, miners and users, then why not? You get 50% of the coins, I understand why you are pleased. I just send a message to BTC-E with 3 questions: - are you going to list ZTC? - what did solracx pay you? - how much do I have to pay to get it delisted? Hey, I haven't heard that rumor!!! You telling me BTC-E is going to list ZTC!? Yeah, I'll pump up the price so you can dump your premined 50%
|
|
|
|
Kyune
|
|
June 10, 2013, 09:38:24 PM |
|
Have you folks not heard of GitHub?
How could you expect me to know which of your multiple releases some source code I find on GitHub corresponds to? It could be this release or one of the "aborted" releases where you let people mine for a while and then attempted to declare the mined blockchain null and void. If you go to www.zenithcoin.com you will find all the links there. This 'faux' confusion stuff is getting really old. This response just alienates people like me. It was real confusion. I couldn't tell from the original post whether source code was available, which is a must for me. I was the first to point out, back in another thread, that eagleeye's fork secretly altered the hardcoded "dev" addresses, which I thought was a dick move. But since then, it seems like you've been taking a pretty heavy-handed. micromanaging approach. I find it distasteful.
|
BTC: 1K4VpdQXQhgmTmq68rbWhybvoRcyNHKyVP
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
June 10, 2013, 09:41:59 PM |
|
Have you folks not heard of GitHub?
How could you expect me to know which of your multiple releases some source code I find on GitHub corresponds to? It could be this release or one of the "aborted" releases where you let people mine for a while and then attempted to declare the mined blockchain null and void. If you go to www.zenithcoin.com you will find all the links there. This 'faux' confusion stuff is getting really old. This response just alienates people like me. It was real confusion. I couldn't tell from the original post whether source code was available, which is a must for me. I was the first to point out, back in another thread, that eagleeye's fork secretly altered the hardcoded "dev" addresses, which I thought was a dick move. But since then, it seems like you've been taking a pretty heavy-handed. micromanaging approach. I find it distasteful. "Members only mining", "e-mail only giveaway", "50% premine mining", "re-release cause he didn't like the first and second release", etc... Worst altcoin release ever... And this guy thinks it will be worth more than a fastcoin
|
|
|
|
emerefer
|
|
June 10, 2013, 09:49:38 PM |
|
So he gets 50% of the coins and he's already trying to get it on an exchange Seems legit
|
|
|
|
solracx (OP)
|
|
June 10, 2013, 09:50:11 PM |
|
Have you folks not heard of GitHub?
How could you expect me to know which of your multiple releases some source code I find on GitHub corresponds to? It could be this release or one of the "aborted" releases where you let people mine for a while and then attempted to declare the mined blockchain null and void. If you go to www.zenithcoin.com you will find all the links there. This 'faux' confusion stuff is getting really old. This response just alienates people like me. It was real confusion. I couldn't tell from the original post whether source code was available, which is a must for me. I was the first to point out, back in another thread, that eagleeye's fork secretly altered the hardcoded "dev" addresses, which I thought was a dick move. But since then, it seems like you've been taking a pretty heavy-handed. micromanaging approach. I find it distasteful. micromanaging what? miners are mining the coin. all i have are these folks that keep trying to come up with fake clients. why they do it, i have no clue! Anyway, if you are looking for info, it is all there at www.zenithcoin.com. GitHub location has always been the same.
|
ZenithCoin - Sustainable Scrypt Based Crypto Currency
|
|
|
solracx (OP)
|
|
June 10, 2013, 09:51:21 PM |
|
So he gets 50% of the coins and he's already trying to get it on an exchange Seems legit Actually, getting it to an exchange is not a priority. Creating an exchange, well that's the higher priority.
|
ZenithCoin - Sustainable Scrypt Based Crypto Currency
|
|
|
milly6
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1632
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 11, 2013, 01:41:45 PM |
|
Restrictions: Give away counted only for miners that register by emailing info@zenithcoin.com. Miner should provide proof by providing ZenithCoin address. what a joke this has become +1 No source code = No mining. "Se te va la olla,..." The source code is in the same place all source code is.... Google isn't hard. It shouldn't have to be. It should be in the OP. Period. Have you folks not heard of GitHub? have you ever heard of full disclosure?
|
|
|
|
|