FAKE - LitecoinFoundation.org donates 2000 LTC to wtogami and Aspect for 0.8.2

[hathmill]

You guys can say what ever you want, I still think my comments are pointless and only serves the purpose of bumping this thread to max the attention a good drama brings.

Joking aside, some drama is actually refreshing read (instead of "new alt coin released"). Especially since all participants in this one are prominent people.

 

[mmitech]

You guys can say what ever you want, I still think my comments are pointless and only serves the purpose of bumping this thread to max the attention a good drama brings.

Joking aside, some drama is actually refreshing read (instead of "new alt coin released"). Especially since all participants in this one are prominent people.

 

+1

[coblee]

Chaang,

We made it pretty clear in the development fund thread, that the LTC received will be used in a responsible way. All the current LTC devs are in constant contact with each other. And we all have to agree to something before the funds are used. And every expense is laid out in the public.

There is no secret deal. We have not made any deals with anyone that would unfairly influence the direction of the project. Each one of us are adamant about this point. The large mysterious donor just wanted to help out our cause and did not want his identity known. Is that a crime? No. Does that mean he has a secret influence on us? No!

It is true that I was preoccupied with RL a year ago and let Litecoin development slip. Greedi took advantage of that and tried to claim himself to be the lead developer of Litecoin. I was not aware of that. Did he ask for donation and did you donate to him? I'm sorry for your lost LTC. But you could have easily done your due diligence before donating. I was still available via PM on bitcointalk. If I had received a PM from you saying that "Greedi is claiming to be the lead developer of Litecoin. Is that true?", I would have come back sooner to clean house. The second I found out Greedi was overstepping, I took cared of it.

If you wanted to donate to help improve Litecoin, then please donate to the development fund that all the LTC devs agreed to use. If you want to donate to a single person, feel free to do that in private. But publicly donating to 2 of the devs seems a bit manipulative. And that's why aspect called you out on it.

[wtogami]

You folks want me to respond to this mess, or to push some code that fixes bugs in the new 0.6.x release where we are very close?

I think I'll push some code first...

And here us ignorant speculators were tricked into thinking 0.8.2 was right around the corner 

https://plus.google.com/104307324656397909502/posts
I pointed you at important news URL's to read, and you repeatedly refused to read it, instead continuing to ask me questions that were answered in public.

0.6.x and 0.8.2 are being developed simultaneously to both have the same rules.  0.8.2 still has bugs and is very experimental.  I discovered an annoying problem in it a few days ago and fixed it.  We don't want surprises with a new official release, so 0.6.x is the next stable release which reduces fees.

I have an appointment soon.  I'll be back later today.

[mmitech]

Chaang,

We made it pretty clear in the development fund thread, that the LTC received will be used in a responsible way. All the current LTC devs are in constant contact with each other. And we all have to agree to something before the funds are used. And every expense is laid out in the public.

There is no secret deal. We have not made any deals with anyone that would unfairly influence the direction of the project. Each one of us are adamant about this point. The large mysterious donor just wanted to help out our cause and did not want his identity known. Is that a crime? No. Does that mean he has a secret influence on us? No!

It is true that I was preoccupied with RL a year ago and let Litecoin development slip. Greedi took advantage of that and tried to claim himself to be the lead developer of Litecoin. I was not aware of that. Did he ask for donation and did you donate to him? I'm sorry for your lost LTC. But you could have easily done your due diligence before donating. I was still available via PM on bitcointalk. If I had received a PM from you saying that "Greedi is claiming to be the lead developer of Litecoin. Is that true?", I would have come back sooner to clean house. The second I found out Greedi was overstepping, I took cared of it.

If you wanted to donate to help improve Litecoin, then please donate to the development fund that all the LTC devs agreed to use. If you want to donate to a single person, feel free to do that in private. But publicly donating to 2 of the devs seems a bit manipulative. And that's why aspect called you out on it.

+1

[El Cabron]

Chaang,

We made it pretty clear in the development fund thread, that the LTC received will be used in a responsible way. All the current LTC devs are in constant contact with each other. And we all have to agree to something before the funds are used. And every expense is laid out in the public.

There is no secret deal. We have not made any deals with anyone that would unfairly influence the direction of the project. Each one of us are adamant about this point. The large mysterious donor just wanted to help out our cause and did not want his identity known. Is that a crime? No. Does that mean he has a secret influence on us? No!

It is true that I was preoccupied with RL a year ago and let Litecoin development slip. Greedi took advantage of that and tried to claim himself to be the lead developer of Litecoin. I was not aware of that. Did he ask for donation and did you donate to him? I'm sorry for your lost LTC. But you could have easily done your due diligence before donating. I was still available via PM on bitcointalk. If I had received a PM from you saying that "Greedi is claiming to be the lead developer of Litecoin. Is that true?", I would have come back sooner to clean house. The second I found out Greedi was overstepping, I took cared of it.

If you wanted to donate to help improve Litecoin, then please donate to the development fund that all the LTC devs agreed to use. If you want to donate to a single person, feel free to do that in private. But publicly donating to 2 of the devs seems a bit manipulative. And that's why aspect called you out on it.

We were just following the advice of warren (and that is why aspect was included in the donation).

I'm going to PM you about other details so they are not public.

[El Cabron]

You folks want me to respond to this mess, or to push some code that fixes bugs in the new 0.6.x release where we are very close?

I think I'll push some code first...

And here us ignorant speculators were tricked into thinking 0.8.2 was right around the corner 

https://plus.google.com/104307324656397909502/posts
I pointed you at important news URL's to read, and you repeatedly refused to read it, instead continuing to ask me questions that were answered in public.

0.6.x and 0.8.2 are being developed simultaneously to both have the same rules.  0.8.2 still has bugs and is very experimental.  I discovered an annoying problem in it a few days ago and fixed it.  We don't want surprises with a new official release, so 0.6.x is the next stable release which reduces fees.

I have an appointment soon.  I'll be back later today.

Quoting PMs eh? Can I publish my log for transparency?