Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 04:38:15 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Curious whether to run 0.8.2 or 0.8.1  (Read 449 times)
Krellan (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 09:57:04 PM
 #1

I've been running 0.8.1 for a while, it's tried and true.

Should I upgrade to 0.8.2?

What advantages and disadvantages does it bring?

I'm curious, because even though 0.8.2 came out recently, I did "getpeerinfo" in my client and find that the vast majority of other nodes that I'm connected to are still running 0.8.1.  Are people holding back for a reason?

Thanks!

Josh

1JUZr4TZ5zuB4WdEv4mrhZMaM7yttpJvLG Smiley
Birdy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 12, 2013, 10:01:44 PM
 #2

0,8.2 has lower fees, but you cannot send extreme small BTC-amounts (<5430 Satoshis) anymore.
Some people don't like the dust restriction, but I don't really care about it, so yay lower fees for me :3
co5hike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 12, 2013, 10:19:10 PM
 #3

0,8.2 has lower fees, but you cannot send extreme small BTC-amounts (<5430 Satoshis) anymore.

anyone has idea why 5430 Satoshis was choosen and not 1000, 5000 or 10000  Huh
Birdy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 12, 2013, 10:27:57 PM
 #4

0,8.2 has lower fees, but you cannot send extreme small BTC-amounts (<5430 Satoshis) anymore.

anyone has idea why 5430 Satoshis was choosen and not 1000, 5000 or 10000  Huh

Yes

Quote
Payments (transaction outputs) of 0.543 times the minimum relay fee
(0.00005430 BTC) are now considered 'non-standard', because storing them
costs the network more than they are worth and spending them will usually
cost their owner more in transaction fees than they are worth.

Link to the full release notes:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=219504.0
Krellan (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 14, 2013, 09:07:27 PM
 #5

Interesting.

5430 Satoshis does seem like a magic number.  Any insight as to how it was derived?  The release notes just says that's the amount, without explaining why, as if the number just came down on a stone tablet from the sky.

I'm glad to see the lower minimum TX fee.  I think it should be even lower.  The blocks aren't maxing out yet, at 1MB/block.  There's still plenty of headroom to accept more transactions.

1JUZr4TZ5zuB4WdEv4mrhZMaM7yttpJvLG Smiley
WhiteThunder
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 14, 2013, 09:11:34 PM
 #6

Interesting.

5430 Satoshis does seem like a magic number.  Any insight as to how it was derived?  The release notes just says that's the amount, without explaining why, as if the number just came down on a stone tablet from the sky.

I'm glad to see the lower minimum TX fee.  I think it should be even lower.  The blocks aren't maxing out yet, at 1MB/block.  There's still plenty of headroom to accept more transactions.


5430 must be a clue! To what? I do not know, but a clue nonetheless.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!