Bitcoin Cash is the Real BTC That fulfills Satoshi Nakamoto White Paper

[timikulit]

Bitcoin Cash is the Real Bitcoin

This is because Bitcoin Cash still follows Satoshi Nakamotos Whitepaper

https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-coms-clarification-on-bitcoin-fork-symbols-and-monikers/





https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

[jonald_fyookball]

Looks like the market is starting to figure that out. 

[soepri]

oh kinda interesting to watch, but can bch really replace btc in the future ? or will it just pop up like a bubble ?

[timikulit]

Big banks (Jamie Dimon) and millionaires (Warren Buffet, Jack Ma) already knew this, That's why they are saying that bitcoin is a scam

If you look in the picture you will notice that segwit is added in bitcoin which gives them an ability to discard transaction signatures in the block chain. bitcoin segwit is also centralized because of its single implementation team

Unlike bitcoin cash. it only increases the blocks into 8mb that gives faster transaction to cater the demand of the world with lower fees.

For me bitcoin cash is the real chain of old bitcoin founded by satoshi nakamoto.

[flashmark]

oh kinda interesting to watch, but can bch really replace btc in the future ? or will it just pop up like a bubble ?

To me BCH price hike is a bubble. I hope BTC start rally again when it get support around 6000 region.

[HabBear]

oh kinda interesting to watch, but can bch really replace btc in the future ? or will it just pop up like a bubble ?

Can it? No. Bitcoin will exist. Bitcoin Cash will exist. Will Bitcoin Cash surpass Bitcoin in value? Possibly...all depends on the market. Will demand shift to using Bitcoin Cash? Only time will tell.

Since Bitcoin is less of a currency and more of an asset class it makes Bitcoin Cash more of a threat.

[bitfools]

Bitcoin Cash is the Real Bitcoin

This is because Bitcoin Cash still follows Satoshi Nakamotos Whitepaper - NOT!

That's funny the 'white paper' didn't mention NYA or Chinese ASIC miners as being the centralized control.

Satoshi wrote BTC 1.0, and that was final.

It seems to me that the BIG-FISH ( bankers, gov, ... ) are turning the Egalitarian Nature of Satoshi, over to their way of thinking.

BTC will live on, SEGWIT2 was declared a failure, BITMAIN forces purchase of their HW in BCH, thus the BCH price doesn't collapse, as their would be no market if ppl didn't have to BUY BCH to buy their S9's, D3's, or L3's.

NYA(GOV) & ASIS-MINING(china/Bitmain) are the forces behind BCH, all of this is against everything that Satoshi believed. Satoshi was an anarchist, he hated gov, he hated centralization.

Satoshi wanted to put the power  of banking into the hands of the people.

People in CHINA(ASIC), and NYA just want to control the world, they want to be the next FEDERAL-RESERVE-BANK, post collapse of the USD.

They can do as they wish, but PLEEEEZE don't say that any of this IMF/APEC/BRIC/BIS stuff has Satoshi's blessing, because it does NOT

SATOSHI is an ANARCHIST, he trusted NO GOV, or BANK

[bitfools]

oh kinda interesting to watch, but can bch really replace btc in the future ? or will it just pop up like a bubble ?

To me BCH price hike is a bubble. I hope BTC start rally again when it get support around 6000 region.

Artificial bubble created and maintained by BITMAIN, they could easily sell 10K BTCS & buy BCH and flip it tomorrow, they probably will eventually, when they're ready.

There was recent chinese written article about the plan for bch, with the intended goal that China take over BTC, by way of BCH, that BTC was the currency of kings, and not of little people.

Honestly, this is like turning Satoshi's baby into the Frankenstein monster.

Possible, sure human greed, while 2009 BTC may have been 99% anarchist, today its 90% greedy short time thinking fools, and get rich quick nihilists.

Just keep working on BTC 2.0 from scratch, BTC is now nearing 10 years of age, we know the problems, we know the weaknesses, its still possible for little people to control their wealth.

[bitfools]

Big banks (Jamie Dimon) and millionaires (Warren Buffet, Jack Ma) already knew this, That's why they are saying that bitcoin is a scam

If you look in the picture you will notice that segwit is added in bitcoin which gives them an ability to discard transaction signatures in the block chain. bitcoin segwit is also centralized because of its single implementation team

Unlike bitcoin cash. it only increases the blocks into 8mb that gives faster transaction to cater the demand of the world with lower fees.

For me bitcoin cash is the real chain of old bitcoin founded by satoshi nakamoto.

Jack Ma owns the websites that trade BTC HARDWARE aka BITMAIN, don't think for a moment that Jack Ma don't own millions of Yuan of BTC. Alibaba ( the Amazon of China ) is the web-store for Bitmain, IMHO Jack-Ma is Bitcoin in CHINA, as Certainly when BITMAIN needs money, they come crawling to the richest man in China

Buffet actually said "I don't invest in what I don't understand"

Dimon, well he just is a status quo banker, with all to lose, and nothing to gain.

Bill Gates said it best "Nothing can stop the IDEA of Bitcoin"

Like 'V for Vendetta' its an idea, an idea that little people don't need banks, and GOV doesn't need to know how much money you have, or what you spend it on, its an IDEAD that cannot be killed.

[Soros Shorts]

Looks like the market is starting to figure that out. 

That may be so, but there are still very few places where you can spend BCH. And those big blocks are still mostly empty. BCH has yet to prove that big blocks are safe for the network. If big blocks are eventually proven to be safe, increasing the blocksize (perhaps by a more conservative amount) is something that core could easily adopt, negating any advantage of BCH.

[jonald_fyookball]

 increasing the blocksize (perhaps by a more conservative amount) is something that core could easily adopt, negating any advantage of BCH.

Not easily.  They would need to convince 51%+ of the miners, including the miners they treated badly in the past...and unbrainwash their followers
to believe HF are no longer bad , etc... there is a big risk of a chain split.

 plus there is still the absense of segwit ,and also decentralized development, which are nice advantages to BCH.

Besides, why would core change their plans to allow capacity increase?  It defeats the point of everything they want.

[darkangel11]

Looks like the market is starting to figure that out. 

That may be so, but there are still very few places where you can spend BCH. And those big blocks are still mostly empty. BCH has yet to prove that big blocks are safe for the network. If big blocks are eventually proven to be safe, increasing the blocksize (perhaps by a more conservative amount) is something that core could easily adopt, negating any advantage of BCH.

That's really an understatement. I haven't seen or heard of any store that would accept BCH. It's being used only as a conversion coin good for speculation when BTC is correcting. People somehow tend to think that if BTC fails BCH will take over. It won't happen. If BTC fails and loses most of its value some of the money will surely go to BCC , but it will be a dark moment for all cryptocurrencies. If BTC dies people will lose confidence in cryptos and the whole market will crash which will of course include altcoins and IMO the forked coins will suffer the most as people will look for hope in the more anonymous or government issued cryptos.