This right here, I don't really think it's a problem for Ver to have the twitter account bitcoin and try to promote his coin. This would silence his argument and fail to bring his side of the community to the table, which is unfair and unlike us I would assume. I'm not a fan of Ver either -- but is silencing him REALLY the best thing we can do.
Let him speak, even if people don't support what he has to say.
You really do not think that fronting Bitcoin, which is a renowned global brand and when unsuspecting and less informed cryptocurrency enthusiasts follow the lead, they end up with BCash, is no problem
The argument is clearly not about Bitcoin being superior to BCash or not or if Roger has a right to promote his coin or not. But knowing fully well that Bitcoin and BCash are entirely distinct coins and then going ahead to propose the most versatile and valuable coin, only to supply the less valuable one after money have changed hands is indeed a fraud. Roger Ver ought to be promoting BitcoinCash, which is what his project ended at and not Bitcoin, which is an entirely different coin.