Claymore ETH+DCR hashrate for GTX 1060

[GoldenArcher]

Hi,

I searched and found an old thread similar to this, but didn't want to reincarnate it just to ask my questions. I'm mining with a stock GTX 1060 for ETH+DCR on Claymore, and with dcri 50 I'm getting 18-19 mh/s for ETH and 310-315 mh/s for DCR. However, the ETH seems to be much more consistent in solving shares and showing up on my pool site; this is compared to DCR which seems to solve very slowly and most of the time not even appear as active on Supernova pool site. My question is, is the DCR mining just naturally much slower or is it a bad pool/optimization/settings? Thanks for the help in advance!

[Vann]

Now that ASIC's are out for DCR, the share difficulty on the pools has gone up to compensate for the huge increase in network difficulty. With 310 MH/s, after power, you would lose money mining DCR. You are much better off dual mining XVG or SMART which are still profitable to dual mine.

http://whattomine.com/coins/152-dcr-blake-14r?utf8=%E2%9C%93&hr=310&p=20&fee=3.0&cost=0.12&hcost=0.0&commit=Calculate

[GoldenArcher]

Now that ASIC's are out for DCR, the share difficulty on the pools has gone up to compensate for the huge increase in network difficulty. With 310 MH/s, after power, you would lose money mining DCR. You are much better off dual mining XVG or SMART which are still profitable to dual mine.

http://whattomine.com/coins/152-dcr-blake-14r?utf8=%E2%9C%93&hr=310&p=20&fee=3.0&cost=0.12&hcost=0.0&commit=Calculate

Thank you for the info, I'll look into switching my secondary coin. It sucks that I won't be able to access the Decred I've been mining, but it's probably worth it in the long run to switch now.