There are newer cryptocurrencies than BTC with better technology.
just because they were created after bitcoin doesn't make them "new technology". it just makes them a copycat of bitcoin. and most of them are exactly poor copies, some of them are new with a lot of also new issues.
and calling something that is not even used "better" only shows you know nothing John Doe!
However we often insist that BTC is "king" because of its "first mover advantage" and its greater adaption.
it has nothing to do with being "first mover" it is all about its usefulness. bitcoin offers certain features that people want and that will always create the demand and with it the huge rising price.
by the way bitcoin is not the first. there were others before it. which again shows you know nothing John Doe!
Shouldn't we value more technology than adaption? Isn't it natural that in the end other cryptocurrencies with better technology will prevail?
you first have to prove there exists a "better technology" then we can argue about other stuff. we won't just make the assumption that there is some better tech out there just because you fell for the pump and dump advertisement of altcoins.
