Bitcoin Forum
June 01, 2024, 08:17:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: why no billion cap coin uses proof of storage/capacity ?  (Read 79 times)
cryptoassistent (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 01, 2018, 08:18:03 PM
 #1

there is at least one coin using proof of storage instead of proof of work.

This algo is not linked to the wealth of the miner so it seems to be well thought economically.

Storage is less expensive then processing power.

Why no billion coin use it?

 
cryptoassistent (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 04, 2018, 06:31:51 PM
 #2

no info whatsoever?
BTcoint
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 553
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 04, 2018, 06:59:06 PM
 #3

there is at least one coin using proof of storage instead of proof of work.

This algo is not linked to the wealth of the miner so it seems to be well thought economically.

Storage is less expensive then processing power.

Why no billion coin use it?

 
it depends on developers need to implement successful project usually different coins integrate different algo\s as well as (POW , POStor & POStake) also I think the famous one used heavily is POS (Proof of stake ) - my favorite .
Link below show some technical points :
https://siawiki.tech/about/pow_vs_pos

perhaps in near future we can see new invented ALGOs different and effective than all above . innovation will not stop because of electrical consumption or economical thought .
 

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses .100% original codebase.
  Superfast with .30 seconds instant finality.
  Tested .5000 tx per block. on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
cryptoassistent (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 07, 2018, 01:33:13 PM
 #4

But, are you aware of some negative sides of PoStorage algo?

There must be some downsides if noone uses it.
BogdanGFTP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 101



View Profile
July 07, 2018, 01:43:01 PM
 #5

I think that model is not as safe as that is in traditional cryptocurrencies. There is a lot of issues that should be solved but it is very interesting concept of future coins.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!