Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 10:05:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Message  (Read 1849 times)
styx1776 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 24, 2013, 11:08:12 PM
Last edit: October 26, 2017, 04:44:28 PM by styx1776
 #1

Message
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 4186
Merit: 8435



View Profile WWW
November 24, 2013, 11:14:28 PM
 #2

Worse, multibit just connects to whatever nodes are returned in a DNS query, which is easily spoofed.

If electrum really has multiple servers plus SSL authentication working now then I think its easily arguable that its security is strictly superior to multibit.
Mike Hearn
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1129


View Profile
November 24, 2013, 11:33:18 PM
 #3

SSL doesn't mean a whole lot unless you're going to institute some kind of central control over who gets to run nodes. I mean, if the NSA turns up and wants to run 10,000 electrum servers, who would tell them no?

However, if Electrum is now implementing the real SPV model where it's asking a lot of different servers to give it the chain, verifying that chain, selecting the hardest one it can find etc then I agree it shouldn't have a warning anymore, although at that point I wonder why they bothered re-inventing the P2P protocol when they could have just extended it.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!