Bitcoin Forum
June 24, 2024, 02:10:40 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: How to replace the 'good side' of governments?  (Read 448 times)
juanlive (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 09:12:58 PM
 #1

I like the idea to be free from control of governments. In the other hand, I understand that some of these control are aimed to protect small individuals from the power of big pools of abusers. I wonder how that problem (protect individuals from actions of organized and stablished power) could be addressed from the open community perspective.
PenAndPaper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 09:18:10 PM
 #2

Maybe you want to be more specific and mention some examples in the context of bitcoin. I don't think you can get any answers to such a broad topic without specific references
juanlive (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 09:28:14 PM
 #3

I mean: if a government backs a money system, it can take some politic moves to safeguard it and its users. For good and bad, government is somewhat free to regulate its distribution throug many mechanism: generating more or less, charging with taxes some transactions, etc. Some of these moves have not much consensus, like creating too much bills, which may generate inflation, but some others tends to protect small player from the power of the big ones, like taxes for the most riches, etc.
juanlive (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 09:35:33 PM
 #4

In other words: unregulated systems has tended to be in hands of speculators and abusers (like the financial system).
So, how will we protect ourselves against it?
An answer could be that the "wiki-power" could do it, as in wikipedia and other experiences. But I'm not fully convinced yet. I would like to hear serious arguments from both sides.
trumbadera
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 09:53:10 PM
 #5

I mean: if a government backs a money system, it can take some politic moves to safeguard it and its users. For good and bad, government is somewhat free to regulate its distribution throug many mechanism: generating more or less, charging with taxes some transactions, etc. Some of these moves have not much consensus, like creating too much bills, which may generate inflation, but some others tends to protect small player from the power of the big ones, like taxes for the most riches, etc.


The problem is there is no backing of a monetary system, it is only about trust. If it go really bad, no one help you as there is no backing of monetary system, you will have just useless papers.
juanlive (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 04, 2013, 10:48:51 PM
 #6

Well, that's what I'm worried about. Who protects us from concentrated power in few hands?
It also brings us somewhat to a previous age, so as there is no police involved, I'm seeing many cases of people doing the police job and also trying to replace a Justice system. It's interesting because sometimes a community may be better than the police, but sometimes it also may commit abuses.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!