Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 05:58:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Block #273374 OLDER than block #273373 ? How is it possible???  (Read 858 times)
antaresteleko (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0



View Profile
December 06, 2013, 12:37:54 PM
 #1

Hi,

I just noticed that as per blockchain.info that block #273374 seems to be OLDER than block #273373. ¿How could this be possible? Could it just be a delay in blockchain.info's reception time?

Any explanation would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers!
RaTTuS
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 792
Merit: 1000


Bite me


View Profile
December 06, 2013, 12:40:58 PM
 #2

down to the clock on the block owners machine ...

In the Beginning there was CPU , then GPU , then FPGA then ASIC, what next I hear to ask ....

1RaTTuSEN7jJUDiW1EGogHwtek7g9BiEn
hashman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1264
Merit: 1008


View Profile
December 06, 2013, 01:02:02 PM
 #3

It's happened before.  The timestamp is not so important on a scale of block to block, in this case there is clearly a small error in the timestamp because the miner of block 273374 clearly had in hand block 273373 as she included hash of it in her block.  Timestamps become important when it is time to set difficulty, which is why we wait two weeks to adjust the difficulty.. these kind of small errors go out in the wash. 

 
antaresteleko (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0



View Profile
December 06, 2013, 01:07:21 PM
 #4

Thank you hashman and RaTTuS for your clarification!

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!