Max Keiser tweets about Sexcoin

[Baleinium]

Did anyone catch this tweet from Max a few days ago? I was surprised not seeing it talked about more. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think Keiser has only tweeted about Bitcoins, Litecoins and Quarks so far. All of them have increased a lot in value lately so it's interesting seeing Sexcoins also being mentioned. Despite him being rather controversial to some he seems to have a knack of picking cryptos that end up doing very well.

https://twitter.com/maxkeiser/status/410508575228715008

Edit: His co-host Stacy also talked about it -> https://twitter.com/stacyherbert/status/410508438964162560

[Baleinium]

Seriously guys? I realize the news are a few days old but I figured the most influential spokesperson in the crypto world giving a shoutout to a new coin would get more peoples attention. Probably my fault for not having a better title though. Thread tend to get lost quickly in the alt section if they're not written in all caps. Should have called the thread "KEISER PROMOTES SXC 1000% TO THE MOON!" or something

[ratty]

I guess its a good indicator as to whats a scam coin.
Someone show Max how well .adult top level domain worked out for the adult entertainment industry.

[Nano Fiber]

I guess its a good indicator as to whats a scam coin.
Someone show Max how well .adult top level domain worked out for the adult entertainment industry.

If you showed him that, he'd probably start promoting Namecoin next.

[Baleinium]

I guess its a good indicator as to whats a scam coin.
Someone show Max how well .adult top level domain worked out for the adult entertainment industry.

Hmm I'm not sure I catch your meaning. Are you saying that SXC is a scam because Keiser mentioned it, or are you saying that you can identify scams based on the number of capital letters in the title of the thread? Furthermore I do not see how the domain question is relevant to the discussion regardless of which one of the two opinions listed above you subscribe to. Or perhaps you made a different point altogether?