Please judge the dispute. Does it make sense to publish the team during the ICO?

[MarsTerminal]

Hi, friends. Please judge the dispute. Does it make sense to publish the team during the ICO?
Hundreds of projects have blurred the line between good and bad teams.
Does the uniqueness of the idea play a role?
And why do you have confidence in the project where 10 - 30 dead souls are trying to implement a new thousandth Blockchain?

[actmyname]

Not sure if this belongs in Reputation. Probably Altcoin Discussion is a better board for it.Publishing the team lessens the possibility of a scam (though that hasn't stopped anyone). If there is a good idea and a means to implement it, then of course that would garner interest. Blockchain is not limited to a single purpose. It can be expanded and developed. Think about the differences between Monero, Ethereum and Bitcoin as an example.

[muncuss]

Hi, friends. Please judge the dispute. Does it make sense to publish the team during the ICO?
Hundreds of projects have blurred the line between good and bad teams.
Does the uniqueness of the idea play a role?
And why do you have confidence in the project where 10 - 30 dead souls are trying to implement a new thousandth Blockchain?

I have no problem invest in anon ICOs as long as they have clear explanation about the project. but if they publish the team, and i find it's full of trustworthy and skillful people, then i'll put more bucks on that ICO