(I changed the word from "inflation" to BTC Increase rate - only to avoid a pointless argument over whether inflation is a monetary phenomena or a pricing phenomena. I am well aware of that debate in economics, but it should be clear in this context what I meant: monetary inflation)
Answering my own question, here is the table:
Year | New BTCs/yr | Start BTCs | End BTCs | BTC Increase |
2009 | 2625000 | 0 | 2625000 | infinite |
2010 | 2625000 | 2625000 | 5250000 | 100.0% |
2011 | 2625000 | 5250000 | 7875000 | 50.0% |
2012 | 2625000 | 7875000 | 10500000 | 33.3% |
2013 | 1312500 | 10500000 | 11812500 | 12.5% |
2014 | 1312500 | 11812500 | 13125000 | 11.1% |
2015 | 1312500 | 13125000 | 14437500 | 10.0% |
2016 | 1312500 | 14437500 | 15750000 | 9.1% |
2017 | 656250 | 15750000 | 16406250 | 4.2% |
2018 | 656250 | 16406250 | 17062500 | 4.0% |
2019 | 656250 | 17062500 | 17718750 | 3.8% |
2020 | 656250 | 17718750 | 18375000 | 3.7% |
2021 | 328125 | 18375000 | 18703125 | 1.8% |
2022 | 328125 | 18703125 | 19031250 | 1.8% |
2023 | 328125 | 19031250 | 19359375 | 1.7% |
2024 | 328125 | 19359375 | 19687500 | 1.7% |
2025 | 164062.5 | 19687500 | 19851562.5 | 0.8% |
2026 | 164062.5 | 19851562.5 | 20015625 | 0.8% |
2027 | 164062.5 | 20015625 | 20179687.5 | 0.8% |
2028 | 164062.5 | 20179687.5 | 20343750 | 0.8% |
2029 | 82031.25 | 20343750 | 20425781.25 | 0.4% |
2030 | 82031.25 | 20425781.25 | 20507812.5 | 0.4% |
2031 | 82031.25 | 20507812.5 | 20589843.75 | 0.4% |
2032 | 82031.25 | 20589843.75 | 20671875 | 0.4% |
2033 | 41015.625 | 20671875 | 20712890.63 | 0.2% |
Hope this table format comes out right.
It looks like another few years until Bitcoin generation rate is in the same
reported range for existing "printed" currencies.
Demand may remain strong, however, so the above says nothing about what relative value it will have.