techstorm2 (OP)
|
|
January 15, 2014, 11:26:24 AM |
|
Hi All Be gentle with me, just posing a question. We know overstock now accepts btc and took almost 130K in 1 day. Assuming Amazon, Ebay or a few other mega companies accept BTC in 2014, could the bitcoin network handle this in terms of scalability, transaction times. It would be a great problem to have but just concerned things mushroom too quickly which could then have a -ve effect on btc in the media.
|
Dime 7Q3cZtyJemmE8pJsrYgX24mHnkqZX6M6hP BTC 18vbvovBeM5ZTZqR5ZWAy75EXE7qTNipuo Mooncoin 2QgyivUMa7Zun6oPdxeE1yry1aNp5hqrDb LTC Lg3UYGCAe3Tb146PiMqeGNLR7bnjdM447d Doge DPd1XejW8TabJu5gfjyKnuQYQ9Vzw1anXN
|
|
|
mtnminer
|
|
January 15, 2014, 11:48:26 AM |
|
I believe the bitcoin network can handle the load, look at the hashing power we now have online with ASIC's and this number continues to rise. It will actually make transaction fees more "profitable" for miners in pools paying or sharing these fees.
Mtnminer
|
|
|
|
Buffer Overflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
|
|
January 15, 2014, 11:49:24 AM |
|
The network is temporary currently throttled to ~7tps at the moment.
|
|
|
|
OnkelPaul
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1039
Merit: 1005
|
|
January 15, 2014, 11:59:46 AM |
|
I believe the bitcoin network can handle the load, look at the hashing power we now have online with ASIC's and this number continues to rise.
Actually, the hashing power has no direct relation to the transaction handling capacity of the network. At the moment, the main limit seems to be block size and frequency - as the number of transactions per time unit increases, so does the size of each block, but the block size is currently limited to 1 MByte which roughly translates to 7 transactions per second. Here's an article on the topic: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/11/12/bitcoin-needs-to-scale-by-a-factor-of-1000-to-compete-with-visa-heres-how-to-do-it/Onkel Paul
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
January 15, 2014, 01:23:08 PM |
|
If professionnal want made fast transaction ... then ... they "can" up her fee transaction (instead of 0,0002 ...). They save all fee and material from CB so, it's OK.
|
|
|
|
BTC-TK
Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 14
|
|
January 15, 2014, 07:07:28 PM |
|
No
|
|
|
|
bluemeanie1
|
|
January 15, 2014, 07:09:57 PM |
|
I believe the bitcoin network can handle the load, look at the hashing power we now have online with ASIC's and this number continues to rise. It will actually make transaction fees more "profitable" for miners in pools paying or sharing these fees.
Mtnminer
more profitable for miners, more expensive for users.
|
|
|
|
bluemeanie1
|
|
January 15, 2014, 07:12:29 PM |
|
there is also the Color Coins project which will not only add transactions, it will multiply the RATE of transactions perhaps by a factor of thousands(perhaps even hundreds of thousands- there is no limit). at the minimum, having a full block chain copy will be impossible for the average user, further compromising the p2p aspect.
|
|
|
|
Nagle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 15, 2014, 08:09:37 PM |
|
The network is temporary currently throttled to ~7tps at the moment. Right. It's up to ghash.io, which controls most mining power, to decide whether that gets to be raised. They may decide to raise fees instead.
|
|
|
|
Melbustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 15, 2014, 08:15:41 PM |
|
It's up to ghash.io, which controls most mining power...
False. They are the biggest pool, but they do not control "most mining power". Their share has also decreased significantly in the past week. Observe: http://blockchain.info/pools
|
Bitcoin is the first monetary system to credibly offer perfect information to all economic participants.
|
|
|
tacoman71
|
|
January 15, 2014, 08:39:56 PM |
|
I believe the question should be if the network can handle the increased load, but if everyone leaves, can the network handle the sudden loss of hashing power.
|
Feeling generous? Like my post? Leave a tip at BTC: 1NZJ8cceqEiKDZGAJged2vNGCyfFMUEYPt
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
January 15, 2014, 08:49:01 PM |
|
No it can't. It is currently limited. I'm just asking what the devs are doing with their time..
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
phillipsjk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1001
Let the chips fall where they may.
|
|
January 15, 2014, 08:57:22 PM |
|
I believe the question should be if the network can handle the increased load, but if everyone leaves, can the network handle the sudden loss of hashing power.
If that happens 1.wait for price to crash 2. buy cheap miners 3. 4. Profit.
|
James' OpenPGP public key fingerprint: EB14 9E5B F80C 1F2D 3EBE 0A2F B3DE 81FF 7B9D 5160
|
|
|
|