$300 million dollar deal for nChain

[bitcoinvestor]

nChain has already received $300 million of investments, reports Reuters. However, the source did not specify the period of the investment.

Craig Wright, who in December 2015 was the first individual considered the person behind the alias " Satoshi Nakamoto" , gained notoriety in May 2016 when he failed to prove this claim. The incident undermined the businessman’s reputation among the crypto community. Later, he effectively disappeared from the public eye. Some people argue that, although blockchain-related patent applications are filed all the time (including attempts to patent the term “bitcoin”), the idea of patenting is not consistent with the free spirit of the cryptocurrency.


http://www.coinfox.info/news/6958-private-investors-buy-craig-wright-s-company

[Hydrogen]

Does this confirm Craig Wright is bought and owned by a special interest group that paid him $300 million?

And that in exchange for the investment, Craight Wright will say & do whatever those special interests tell him to?

[Baofeng]

Does this confirm Craig Wright is bought and owned by a special interest group that paid him $300 million?

And that in exchange for the investment, Craight Wright will say & do whatever those special interests tell him to?

Oh well, we are now seeing the true colors Craight Wright Roger Ver and Jihan Wu. They are all greedy and everyone is on the money only. Not for the good of bitcoin community and market.

[SaShiRaJaVu]

Does this confirm Craig Wright is bought and owned by a special interest group that paid him $300 million?
And that in exchange for the investment, Craight Wright will say & do whatever those special interests tell him to?

Oh well, we are now seeing the true colors Craight Wright Roger Ver and Jihan Wu. They are all greedy and everyone is on the money only. Not for the good of bitcoin community and market.

Says who,if Craig Wright sells his stakes in the company he owns ,what is the problem with anyone,but one thing is certain that Craig Wright is the developer behind bitcoin and even when he claimed he is the real Satoshi everyone mocked him but he has already revealed to Australian tax authorities that he holds more than a million bitcoin and he really does not need to prove to anyone what his intentions are,i am not a fan of Roger Ver or Jihan Wu as they might be greedy to squeeze the maximum profit.

[European Central Bank]

but one thing is certain that Craig Wright is the developer behind bitcoin

you seem to be the only person i've come across who's so certain about this.

i'm amazed anyone would invest 300 million in this guy. even if he is satoshi, his behaviour is that of a dishonest toddler.

[SaShiRaJaVu]

but one thing is certain that Craig Wright is the developer behind bitcoin

you seem to be the only person i've come across who's so certain about this.
i'm amazed anyone would invest 300 million in this guy. even if he is satoshi, his behaviour is that of a dishonest toddler.

Am i the only person who is certain about it,Craig Wright does own more than a million bitcoin as he has revealed to the tax authorities and can you name one early investor or miner who is holding that much bitcoin and he is not that stupid to lie about that to the tax authorities,he is an Aussie but have business in the UK and the timings of Satoshi when he came online matches with those time zones. Is he willing to move the coins or sign a message to prove he is legit,i am not sure he will spend time doing so.

[European Central Bank]

Craig Wright does own more than a million bitcoin as he has revealed to the tax authorities

i can't find any mention of this anywhere. and traditionally tax authorities want money, not a vague promise that they'll get it some day.

[SaShiRaJaVu]

Craig Wright does own more than a million bitcoin as he has revealed to the tax authorities

i can't find any mention of this anywhere. and traditionally tax authorities want money, not a vague promise that they'll get it some day.

It is not about him giving a vague promise that they will be getting it some day, he just declared his assets to the tax authorities.Just following the news once in a while will reveal what i just said as it is not a news.Are you telling that he is evading tax,i am not sure whether he is following those things and i guess he is paying his dues as he is not being booked for tax evasion from what i understand.

[bitcoinvestor]

Does this confirm Craig Wright is bought and owned by a special interest group that paid him $300 million?

And that in exchange for the investment, Craight Wright will say & do whatever those special interests tell him to?

Oh well, we are now seeing the true colors Craight Wright Roger Ver and Jihan Wu. They are all greedy and everyone is on the money only. Not for the good of bitcoin community and market.

Do you know that Craig Trade bitcoin at Mt.Gox ? Do you think Satoshi Nakamoto who own 1.1 million bitcoin will trade for small of fiat?

" Craig Wright’s MtGox Account

MtGox suffered a number of breaches where user and trading data was leaked. On reddit users winlifeat and apoefjmqdsfls published Wright’s trading history on MtGox and it does not reflect the the trades of the founder of Bitcoin who holds 1.1M coins"
 
https://www.nikcub.com/posts/craig-wright-is-not-satoshi-nakamoto/

[panopotty]

MtGox suffered a number of breaches where user and trading data was leaked. On reddit users winlifeat and apoefjmqdsfls published Wright’s trading history on MtGox and it does not reflect the the trades of the founder of Bitcoin who holds 1.1M coins"[/i][/i]
 
https://www.nikcub.com/posts/craig-wright-is-not-satoshi-nakamoto/

wright traded small amounts that were linked to staff

he had a few sock puppet accounts for his own stuff going to os accounts.

[Xester]

nChain has already received $300 million of investments, reports Reuters. However, the source did not specify the period of the investment.

Craig Wright, who in December 2015 was the first individual considered the person behind the alias " Satoshi Nakamoto" , gained notoriety in May 2016 when he failed to prove this claim. The incident undermined the businessman’s reputation among the crypto community. Later, he effectively disappeared from the public eye. Some people argue that, although blockchain-related patent applications are filed all the time (including attempts to patent the term “bitcoin”), the idea of patenting is not consistent with the free spirit of the cryptocurrency.


http://www.coinfox.info/news/6958-private-investors-buy-craig-wright-s-company

Craig Wright maybe was just a pawn of some giant company that wanted to have a monopoly over bitcoin. Since bitcoin has a great potential and has a multi-billion market many are interested to get a grip and hold bitcoin in their hands and have tried to decentralized bitcoin. Aside from Craig Wright there are also some mining groups that tries to take over the bitcoin network. This is one hell of a ride and bitcoin is a price they want as a price.

[Kakmakr]

According to nChain’s news release, the company “intends to make some of its intellectual property assets available to the blockchain community through open-source software and royalty-free licensing.” Is this now the patents that are not awarded to them or some patents that were filed locally?

Ask yourself this question, why would you offer intellectual property assets for free, if you can make millions from it?

[davis196]

nChain has already received $300 million of investments, reports Reuters. However, the source did not specify the period of the investment.

Craig Wright, who in December 2015 was the first individual considered the person behind the alias " Satoshi Nakamoto" , gained notoriety in May 2016 when he failed to prove this claim. The incident undermined the businessman’s reputation among the crypto community. Later, he effectively disappeared from the public eye. Some people argue that, although blockchain-related patent applications are filed all the time (including attempts to patent the term “bitcoin”), the idea of patenting is not consistent with the free spirit of the cryptocurrency.


http://www.coinfox.info/news/6958-private-investors-buy-craig-wright-s-company

Patent the term "bitcoin"?This is ridiculous.Are we going to pay a fee every time we use this word here?
It`s obvious that this guy isn`t Satoshi Nakamoto and we should do something to stop him.
I`m afraid that other imposters might appear from somewhere.

[Yutikas_11920]

Does this confirm Craig Wright is bought and owned by a special interest group that paid him $300 million?
And that in exchange for the investment, Craight Wright will say & do whatever those special interests tell him to?

Oh well, we are now seeing the true colors Craight Wright Roger Ver and Jihan Wu. They are all greedy and everyone is on the money only. Not for the good of bitcoin community and market.

Says who,if Craig Wright sells his stakes in the company he owns ,what is the problem with anyone,but one thing is certain that Craig Wright is the developer behind bitcoin and even when he claimed he is the real Satoshi everyone mocked him but he has already revealed to Australian tax authorities that he holds more than a million bitcoin and he really does not need to prove to anyone what his intentions are,i am not a fan of Roger Ver or Jihan Wu as they might be greedy to squeeze the maximum profit.

Well this is just supposition or maybe they want to see how effective the name dropped someone who acknowledges that he is the developer of the bitcoin. This is only an issue and not to be a true news going on, a lot of people out there are indeed only looking for sensation and also want to profit from the news they make. Just look at the course and better focus on ourselves in order to become better in the future and see a big advantage in the bitcoin
 

[panopotty]

one thing wright was right about when we worked for him is that people in this group think small.

there are over 100,000 computer science phds and peer systems that scale and bitcoin thinks it has all the good people.

what qualifications do they have in  core?

adam back is a compiler theorest for tech that went nowhere

does maxwell even have a degree?

as much as wright was a dick who got angry when we did not deliver
we did more in hotwire before he shut it down than core has done at all.

if wright had not taken a injunction on us it would have benn out as well already

and what - fukin satoshi not profitin... really are you all that fukin daft.
he has a billion usd worth!

as for this crap about enough
wright is not in it for money - do you think that 300 mil USD will be enough - his type are in to do whatever they are driven by and money will not stop him just as you think it is enough

wright destoryed himself as he wanted nothing to do with this peanut gallery of socialists who think profit is evil.

he was a libertairian you fuks. that means he wants corporations - dah


do you think having 60 phds and devs is not expensive?
wright has more ppl than core and you are all too shite scared to think about what he may be doing

you are playing into HIS hands

he paid off Hotwire and the debt is non-existant. The ATO stuff all gone away. he got away with telling them and then having them NOT believe - you are all so small minded.

[buglergrog]

Panopotty, could you message me? Thanks

[Kristy22]

Last year, The DAO, a decentralized ‘autonomous’ investment fund, got hacked for $50 million. In July, a hacker was able to steal $31M of Ether by exploting a bug found in Parity’s wallets. Today, we have the worst hack yet, only this time, the stakes are even bigger and it is all just one big fuck-up.

Two days ago, a user named ‘devops199’ opened an issue on Parity’s Github, titled “anyone can kill your contract”, seemingly wanting to let Parity, a company that provides smart contracts for users of the Ethereum network, know about a vulnerability in their smart contract.

The smart contract that he was referring to, concerns a ‘multi-signature-contract’, which is used by a large amount of people as a ‘digital wallet’ to safely store their Ethereum. Apparently, this wallet had a ‘bug’ in its code. The bug, or, better said, security vulnerability, allowed Devops199 to make himself one of the ‘owners’ of the contract. This gave him the permission to do pretty much anything.

[freesia_pnp888]

oh wow, never heard about him for such a long time, but I think Craig has learnt a good lesson.