ICO, need help

[Alex7234]

I have three centralized applications, running independently but can be linked together into an ecosystem. Now I want to migrate those 3 applications to dApps, should I ICO ecosystems including those 3 applications or each product? thanks

[Lakai01]

If I didnt get you wrong you have 3 independent applications which can be linked together to an ecosystem and now you want to know, if you should start an ICO for every single application or the ecosystem itself, right?

If so, I would start the ICO for the whole ecosystem. Running ICOs takes a lot of time and effort, additionally, the more features your ICO-product can provide the better and you will attract more potential customers.

[Alex7234]

If I didnt get you wrong you have 3 independent applications which can be linked together to an ecosystem and now you want to know, if you should start an ICO for every single application or the ecosystem itself, right?

If so, I would start the ICO for the whole ecosystem. Running ICOs takes a lot of time and effort, additionally, the more features your ICO-product can provide the better and you will attract more potential customers.

That's right. So why should ICO ecosystem? Sorry about my bad english.

[Lakai01]

Because the more features you can provide the easier people are willing to invest in your project. If you have an already working product (= your ecosystem) and people see an added value in your product they will buy your coins.

[mk4]

Sorry if I sound harsh, but honestly if you'd have to ask if you should do an ICO or not, then you shouldn't be doing ICOs or running your own cryptocurrency in general in the first place. Though you definitely have to give us more information, as saying that you will  "migrate 3 applications to d-apps" is really bland. We don't even know what your applications are about.

[Pearl555]

If I didnt get you wrong you have 3 independent applications which can be linked together to an ecosystem and now you want to know, if you should start an ICO for every single application or the ecosystem itself, right?

If so, I would start the ICO for the whole ecosystem. Running ICOs takes a lot of time and effort, additionally, the more features your ICO-product can provide the better and you will attract more potential customers.

I think you made sense out of it than i did. Its best you integrate all the three applications and run an ICO for them. That will reduce stress. Beside it will also reduce your labour cost since a lot goes into running an ICO.

[Alex7234]

You should start the ICO for the whole ecosystem, IMHO.
This will be an interesting proposal, and possibly more options for using the token in the future.
In the situation with 3 ICO it will be more difficult to combine 3 different tokens into the ecosystem.
I work in https://snowfox.tech and I can make you an interesting offer. If you are interested, write me a private message or an e-mail sergey.philipsky@snowfox.tech

Oh thanks! I need ICO experience. Hope you can help me.