Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 10:39:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The alleged search function  (Read 584 times)
Biomech (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022


Anarchy is not chaos.


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 12:46:57 AM
 #1

The search function on Bitcointalk is broken, to say the least. You can search the EXACT TITLE of a thread and if it comes up at all, it's way down the list.

It's a simple matter to put google custom search on here. I would highly recommend it. Even though there have been promises of upgraded software for the forum, the evidence that it will ever happen is slim. Custom search costs nothing and would take the forum admins maybe a few minutes to implement.

As it stands, if I want to find something on the forum, I'm better off searching from Google than trying to use the internal search engine. Then people tell me to use the search function. I do. It don't work.
Gordon Bleu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


verified ✔


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 12:50:18 AM
 #2

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=search same as  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=search;advanced;search=

GAWMiners http://gawminers.com/ Gridseed ASICS in stock in USA
ONE YEAR FREE HOSTING AND ELECTRICITY WITH PURCHASE!






AROUSR.COM The Adult Chat Community (21+) We now accept BTCitcoins Smiley               |
Connect with hot girls for chat, talk, trade pics and more!➠Visit http://arousr.com (21+)|
Biomech (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022


Anarchy is not chaos.


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:15:28 AM
 #3


Weird. Then why do I get such different results when searching at google.com vs. using the search function? Is there some sort of filter WITHIN the site that makes it turn up irrelevant results while ignoring exact text? Or is bitcointalk or SMF simply possessed?

edit: Thanks for the links. I admit when I'm wrong, but something is still wonky here.
Maged
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 05:19:34 AM
 #4

If you're using the search bar that's on every page, keep in mind that it only searches within your current context. For example, in a thread, it will only search that thread. On a board, it will only search that board, etc.

Biomech (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022


Anarchy is not chaos.


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 06:02:48 AM
 #5

If you're using the search bar that's on every page, keep in mind that it only searches within your current context. For example, in a thread, it will only search that thread. On a board, it will only search that board, etc.

I figured that out the first day Smiley

No, it's that it seems to draw on totally irrelevant data while ignoring exact text. Yet I can run the exact same search in google (from their site) and it will bring up the relevant text as the first result. I actually do this instead of using the internal search more often than not due to frustration. With custom search, it SHOULD do this faster and better than from the main google.com page.

As an example, I just typed in "my little bitcoin" (sans the quote marks) in both google and bitcointalk. This is a thread I started, and that is it's exact title. On google.com it's the first result. Here it's not even on the first four pages. (after which it times out with "you're searching too fast". )
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5208
Merit: 13013


View Profile
February 12, 2014, 02:24:11 PM
 #6

Quote
As an example, I just typed in "my little bitcoin" (sans the quote marks) in both google and bitcointalk.

The forum understands this as my OR little OR bitcoin. Surround it when quotes and you'll get the desired thread as the first result.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!