|
jl2012
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1111
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 03:56:22 AM |
|
It has a dust output: 0.00000001. Ask the sender why he did so.
|
Donation address: 374iXxS4BuqFHsEwwxUuH3nvJ69Y7Hqur3 (Bitcoin ONLY) LRDGENPLYrcTRssGoZrsCT1hngaH3BVkM4 (LTC) PGP: D3CC 1772 8600 5BB8 FF67 3294 C524 2A1A B393 6517
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 04:08:34 AM |
|
Yes, a bit strange. Whoever sent this to you did this: 182sd6f8TuLiGqNc5YMbmnLjYfWhne4XW5 - (Unspent) 0.00000001 BTC - strange ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) 1M7Z9DodWydyr96bPeZmtEvSiAD4qDzW3H - (Unspent) 0.30 BTC - To you 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E - (Unspent) 0.01531233 BTC - change, normal + 0.0001 fee strange send in the first line might be what is holding it up. You probably have to wait for the transaction to get thrown out and then ask him to send it again but this time leave out the one satoshi dust transfer. Also: Since size 3174 (bytes) it would not hurt to add a bigger fee.
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 04:14:10 AM |
|
Since OP decided to cross post this everywhere here is my response from the other thread. OP don't do that again. It is annoying to find the same post in multiple sub forums. The other forum is a better location this isn't a development & technical discussion it is a request for support. Insufficient tx fees. The tx is low priority which means most nodes will require a tx fee to relay. The min fee for relaying on low priority tx is 0.1 mBTC per KB. The tx is 4KB (rounded up) so the min fee would be 0.4 mBTC. Miners running reference implementation see txs with fee below the min as free. It will be included whenever a miner has space for a free transaction. It could be the next block or it could be next week. It also has an output below the dust threshold which means most nodes and miners will simply drop this tx as invalid. Did you create this tx? It shouldn't be possible to create a tx like this using the reference client (or one which follows similar rules). If you send a tx without fees (and less than min for low priority tx is essentially zero) then you are relying on the generosity of miners to include it when they can. If you create a non-standard tx then all bets are off. It may never get relayed by anyone to any miner or one or more miners may simply drop it from the memory pool. In hindsight blockchain.info already said essentially the same thing Confirmation Warnings: Low priority. This transaction has a very small output and is none* (sic) standard. The transaction fee is less than recommended. * none standard should be non-standard.
|
|
|
|
Rulishix (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 04:49:22 AM |
|
Thanks, guys for the answer. Sorry for the crosspost.
|
|
|
|
undeadbitcoiner
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 04:54:00 AM |
|
Summary Size 3174 (bytes) Received Time 2014-02-17 07:12:16 Estimated Confirmation Time Unknown (Low Priority) Relayed by IP Blockchain.info
7306496157644a0687a16e4caedc684263482a98060c56624e5e09e58facfc36 1EC9SoJJhexoyd5KMDivtbEmueUPanWy4F (0.00794262 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.2 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.007 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.00255754 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.02 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.006 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.0009 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.00112 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.00096094 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.005 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.0011125 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.002 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.0058 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.01111874 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.007 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.0069 BTC - Output) 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E (0.03 BTC - Output) 182sd6f8TuLiGqNc5YMbmnLjYfWhne4XW5 - (Unspent) 0.00000001 BTC 1M7Z9DodWydyr96bPeZmtEvSiAD4qDzW3H - (Unspent) 0.3 BTC 1GLauaacoDT5jeCcQFk3AGAgqgyXjh5k2E - (Unspent) 0.01531233 BTC
|
|
|
|
Rulishix (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 06:30:05 AM |
|
Is that what he did? Goddamn! Fuck me. That will take forever to confirm, huh?e
|
|
|
|
erono
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 07:38:55 AM |
|
I once waited a Transaction to Confirmed for 36 hours.
|
|
|
|
Amitabh S
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1001
Merit: 1005
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 07:41:33 AM |
|
This will likely never confirm. Who sent you this? If you don't mind, please share this info. Smells fishy as the sender likely hopes it will get dropped after sometime.
|
|
|
|
serje
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 07:48:20 AM |
|
This will likely never confirm. Who sent you this? If you don't mind, please share this info. Smells fishy as the sender likely hopes it will get dropped after sometime.
The owner of a pozi sent this but it seems the owner was smart enough to make automated transactions but he used blockchain.info wallet that's why his address appears so many times in the sent side of the window because blockchain.info wallet every time you make a transactions makes a temporary deposit address with the same name to put there some coins just like qt client but at blockchain you have the same address I've experimented this on my own https://blockchain.info/tx/4dd869bcd2db2becbfe0a7435d12afcc67fe13a5c5c9e3c955c5fa97aa630ee2and decided I will not use blockchain.info again until they make something with this ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
Space for rent if its still trending
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 07:49:35 AM |
|
This will likely never confirm. Who sent you this? If you don't mind, please share this info. Smells fishy as the sender likely hopes it will get dropped after sometime.
Yeah it could be a good setup for a double spend. Attacker creates tx, feigns ignorance on why it won't confirm. After the deal is completed, miners eventually drop the tx from memory pool and attacker double spends. No real "race" because the legit tx was kneecapped at the starting line.
|
|
|
|
serje
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 07:53:31 AM |
|
This will likely never confirm. Who sent you this? If you don't mind, please share this info. Smells fishy as the sender likely hopes it will get dropped after sometime.
Yeah it could be a good setup for a double spend. Attacker creates tx, feigns ignorance on why it won't confirm. After the deal is completed, miners eventually drop the tx from memory pool and attacker double spends. No real "race" because the legit tx was kneecapped at the starting line. I doubt the attacker had that in mind as his pozi is now ruined because of this this was a guy who sent 0.3BTC to his ponzi and after 2 days of being stuck at paying him back 0.36BTC he decided to refund him with 0.3BTC but it seems the ponzi owner is a newbie to blockchain wallets also not only on this forum name of pozni is nisaai ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) search it up
|
Space for rent if its still trending
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1137
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 09:53:06 PM |
|
If he is using blockchain.info then didn't he have to add the dust output himself? Why did he add the dust output? Best reason I can think of is to delay the payment (probably forever) as stated above. Sounds fishy to me.
|
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
|
|
|
Rulishix (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 11:33:04 PM |
|
Transaction is finally on my Multibit client but it's taking forever to fucking confirm! It's up to 10 peers right now. Lol.
|
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 18, 2014, 11:35:27 PM |
|
Transaction is finally on my Multibit client but it's taking forever to fucking confirm! It's up to 10 peers right now. Lol.
Since most peers are droping the tx the best thing the sender can do is delete the original tx and then create a new one with proper fee, and no dust outputs. It should propogate the network very rapidly (as only nodes which kept the original will block it) and will be included in a block by a miner quickly. This transaction in theory could not confirm in decades if no miner either is relayed the tx or chooses to not drop it from the memory pool.
|
|
|
|
|